當(dāng)阿克斯頓·貝茨-漢密爾頓在大學(xué)里第一次支付水電費(fèi)賬單時(shí),她很快就意識(shí)到事情極其不對(duì)勁。
事實(shí)證明,她是身份盜用的受害者——這導(dǎo)致她信用破產(chǎn)。
2001年,當(dāng)貝茨-漢密爾頓還是一名19歲的學(xué)生時(shí),新公用事業(yè)公司以她的信用評(píng)分低為由,要求她繳納100美元的保證金才能開(kāi)通服務(wù)。
她對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“我以為是因?yàn)樽约盒庞迷u(píng)分不夠?!钡芎?,當(dāng)她的信箱里出現(xiàn)了一份信用報(bào)告副本時(shí),她才知道事實(shí)恰恰相反。
“起初,我認(rèn)為信用報(bào)告一定附有很多說(shuō)明,因?yàn)槲业男庞脠?bào)告不應(yīng)該這么厚。應(yīng)該只有半頁(yè)紙的內(nèi)容——姓名、地址和幾筆學(xué)生貸款。我打開(kāi)一看,意識(shí)到信用報(bào)告并沒(méi)有附帶很多說(shuō)明,但我的信用報(bào)告卻長(zhǎng)達(dá)10頁(yè),里面全是欺詐性的信用卡記錄。”
其中一些記錄可以追溯到1993年,當(dāng)時(shí)她11歲。當(dāng)她向征信機(jī)構(gòu)提出異議時(shí),部分記錄被刪除了,僅僅是因?yàn)槟承﹤鶛?quán)人破產(chǎn)了。然而,還有一些記錄直到過(guò)了年限才被從她的歷史記錄中刪除——這通常需要七年左右的時(shí)間。
對(duì)大多數(shù)人來(lái)說(shuō),身份盜竊會(huì)讓人聯(lián)想到匿名的、從事非法活動(dòng)的黑客。但對(duì)包括貝茨-漢密爾頓在內(nèi)的許多受害者而言,罪魁禍?zhǔn)自诟咏业牡胤健?/p>
在貝茨-漢密爾頓的案例中,罪魁禍?zhǔn)资撬哪赣H。
普遍存在的問(wèn)題
貝茲-漢密爾頓在20世紀(jì)90年代成為兒童身份盜竊的受害者,但這種犯罪在今天仍然很普遍。
卡內(nèi)基梅隆大學(xué)(Carnegie Mellon)的CyLab在2011年進(jìn)行的一項(xiàng)具有里程碑意義的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),兒童因?yàn)樘厥庠蚋菀壮蔀樯矸荼I竊的受害者。
在對(duì)4萬(wàn)多名美國(guó)兒童的分析中,該大學(xué)的研究人員發(fā)現(xiàn),10%的兒童的社會(huì)安全號(hào)碼被他人盜用。這意味著兒童成為身份盜竊受害者的可能性是成年人的51倍。
報(bào)告的作者稱,兒童的身份被用來(lái)購(gòu)買(mǎi)房屋和汽車(chē)、辦理信用卡和獲得就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì),他們?cè)诜治隼锇l(fā)現(xiàn)的最小的受害者只有五個(gè)月大。
與此同時(shí),Javelin Strategy公司在2021年的一項(xiàng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn),每年每50名美國(guó)兒童中就有一人成為身份盜竊的受害者,其中73%的受害者成為他們熟識(shí)的人的目標(biāo)。
數(shù)字安全公司Aura的首席執(zhí)行官及創(chuàng)始人哈里·拉維錢(qián)德蘭告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,兒童身份盜竊案的犯罪者“通?!迸c受害者有親戚關(guān)系。
他說(shuō):“很多時(shí)候,涉及的家庭都處于水深火熱之中,他們面臨著嚴(yán)重的財(cái)務(wù)危機(jī)或成癮問(wèn)題。當(dāng)孩子出生時(shí),他們會(huì)得到一個(gè)社會(huì)安全號(hào)碼,這個(gè)號(hào)碼直到孩子大約17歲或18歲才會(huì)使用,因此能夠在很長(zhǎng)的時(shí)間內(nèi)使用這樣一個(gè)無(wú)不良信用記錄的社會(huì)安全號(hào)碼?!?/p>
真的是媽媽盜用了身份嗎?
直到她的母親于2013年去世后,貝茨-漢密爾頓才終于意識(shí)到誰(shuí)是導(dǎo)致她陷入經(jīng)濟(jì)困境的欺詐行為的幕后黑手。母親去世幾周后,她接到了父親打來(lái)的一個(gè)改變她一生的電話。
她說(shuō):“他在翻看(我媽媽的舊物)時(shí),拿出一張我名下的信用卡的賬單。他準(zhǔn)備劈頭蓋臉訓(xùn)斥我——對(duì)我大吼大叫,因?yàn)槲以?001年透支了信用卡?!?/p>
隨著談話的深入,貝茨-漢密爾頓意識(shí)到,母親就是用那張以她的名義開(kāi)具的信用卡騙取貸款的(這只是其中一項(xiàng)貸款)。在她母親的檔案里進(jìn)一步發(fā)現(xiàn)的證據(jù)證明,她母親是這一切的始作俑者——而且還發(fā)現(xiàn),她不僅對(duì)女兒的身份盜竊負(fù)有責(zé)任,還對(duì)以貝茨-漢密爾頓的父親和祖父的名義進(jìn)行的欺詐負(fù)有責(zé)任。
貝茨-漢密爾頓對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“發(fā)現(xiàn)真相的那一刻,就像感受到了兩種極端的情緒。作為一個(gè)在身份盜用陰影中生活了20年,卻不知道誰(shuí)是罪魁禍?zhǔn)椎娜?,?dāng)時(shí)的感覺(jué)就像,哇,我們終于知道誰(shuí)是始作俑者了,我們?cè)僖膊挥眠@樣生活了——但后來(lái)又想:真的是媽媽盜用了身份嗎?答案是肯定的?!?/p>
貝茨-漢密爾頓還沒(méi)來(lái)得及為自己建立信用,就被她媽媽的欺詐行為拖累,信用分?jǐn)?shù)降到了380分。
在美國(guó),F(xiàn)ICO信用評(píng)分——最常用的信用評(píng)分——介于300分到850分之間,700分或以上通常被貸款機(jī)構(gòu)視為“信用良好”。根據(jù)益博睿(Experian)的數(shù)據(jù),去年美國(guó)人的平均FICO信用評(píng)分為714分。
信用評(píng)分是貸款機(jī)構(gòu)用來(lái)判斷某人是否有能力償還貸款的指標(biāo),因此在貸款和信用卡等債務(wù)方面非常重要。甚至房東有時(shí)也會(huì)在同意租房之前要求查看潛在租戶的信用評(píng)分,如果評(píng)分較低,即低于600分左右,可能就會(huì)給潛在租戶造成困難。
2001年,貝茨-漢密爾頓的不良信用報(bào)告使她在美國(guó)的所有信用評(píng)分中處于第50百分位數(shù)。她告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,她花了大量的時(shí)間和金錢(qián)來(lái)扭轉(zhuǎn)這種局面。
她說(shuō):“首先,我從一家利率很高的次級(jí)貸款機(jī)構(gòu)申請(qǐng)了一張信用卡……[而且]額度只有300美元。我的第一筆車(chē)貸用來(lái)購(gòu)買(mǎi)一輛用了五年的二手車(chē),年利率為18.23%,這就像用信用卡買(mǎi)了一輛二手車(chē)一樣。”
在她母親去世時(shí),貝茨-漢密爾頓的信用報(bào)告已經(jīng)清除了欺詐記錄。但她指出,她的母親“絕對(duì)”意識(shí)到身份盜竊給女兒造成了多大的經(jīng)濟(jì)損失。
貝茨-漢密爾頓解釋道:“是我告訴她事情有多嚴(yán)重的。她是我第一個(gè)求助的人,因?yàn)樗诮鹑诜?wù)部門(mén)工作,還是家里的理財(cái)專家?!?/p>
總部位于華盛頓特區(qū)的律師事務(wù)所Cohen & Cohen的創(chuàng)始人及執(zhí)行合伙人韋恩·R·科恩對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示,這種犯罪背后的“主要?jiǎng)訖C(jī)”是父母信用不良,無(wú)法進(jìn)行在債務(wù)基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行消費(fèi)。
他說(shuō):“在大多數(shù)州,這是一種罪行——欺詐罪、身份盜竊罪和挪用資金罪都是檢察官可能提出指控的罪名。”
當(dāng)談到貝茨-漢密爾頓的母親犯罪的動(dòng)機(jī)時(shí),貝茨-漢密爾頓永遠(yuǎn)無(wú)法確定,因?yàn)樗龔膩?lái)沒(méi)有機(jī)會(huì)與母親當(dāng)面對(duì)質(zhì)。但通過(guò)與認(rèn)識(shí)她母親的人的交談以及她自己的反思,她有了一些想法。
她說(shuō):“我的外婆顯然和我媽媽非常相似,她會(huì)強(qiáng)迫性購(gòu)物。這種消費(fèi)[歸結(jié)為需要]擁有最豪華的東西,并根據(jù)你穿什么樣的衣服,開(kāi)什么樣的車(chē),讓別人對(duì)你的良好經(jīng)濟(jì)條件印象深刻?!?/p>
“你信任自己的父母”
許多被父母?jìng)Φ娜嗽谏缃幻襟w上分享了他們的故事。
“我18歲時(shí)拿到的第一份信用報(bào)告上有1999年的燃?xì)赓M(fèi)賬單,而我出生于1989年?!币粋€(gè)人在X平臺(tái)上發(fā)帖說(shuō),“我很感激他們?cè)试S我只用出生證明就提出異議,而不是提交一份針對(duì)自己家人的報(bào)案證明。但那可能是因?yàn)槲耶?dāng)時(shí)正在試圖獲得安全許可,而當(dāng)權(quán)派操之過(guò)急?!?/p>
“我媽媽就是這么做的,[我]成年后一直在償還根本不屬于我的債務(wù)。”另一個(gè)人說(shuō)。還有一個(gè)人說(shuō),在她的父母使用她的個(gè)人資料進(jìn)行貸款后,她直到30多歲才讓自己的信用評(píng)分穩(wěn)定下來(lái)。
《財(cái)富》雜志無(wú)法獨(dú)立驗(yàn)證這些軼事。
一位居住在西雅圖、現(xiàn)年27歲的女性在很小的時(shí)候就成了家庭身份盜竊的受害者。她向《財(cái)富》匿名講述了自己的經(jīng)歷。
當(dāng)她在華盛頓大學(xué)(University of Washington)讀大三的時(shí)候,母親鼓勵(lì)她申請(qǐng)第一張信用卡。
她告訴《財(cái)富》雜志:“你相信自己的父母,尤其是母親——你認(rèn)為他們會(huì)保護(hù)你。我想,的確,你顯然比我更了解信貸。但我想她當(dāng)時(shí)會(huì)覺(jué)得:‘哦,這真的易如反掌。’”
她母親說(shuō)服她開(kāi)了第二張額度更高的信用卡,并承諾為她保管好這張信用卡。但隨著時(shí)間的推移,她發(fā)現(xiàn)信用卡上的債務(wù)越來(lái)越多,而且沒(méi)有及時(shí)還清。
她說(shuō),盡管她對(duì)自己的財(cái)務(wù)狀況感到害怕,但她不敢和母親當(dāng)面對(duì)質(zhì)。
“母親是我唯一的撫養(yǎng)人之一——我想如果我把這件事情告訴她,她就會(huì)報(bào)復(fù)我,不供我讀完大學(xué),這確實(shí)會(huì)毀了我們之間的關(guān)系?!彼忉尩?。“但(當(dāng))我查看自己的信用評(píng)分時(shí),卻發(fā)現(xiàn)情況非常糟糕。(她)讓我信用破產(chǎn)。”
她說(shuō),她最終鼓起勇氣和母親談了母親使用她的信用卡的問(wèn)題。
她對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“情況并不樂(lè)觀。我和她斷絕關(guān)系很長(zhǎng)時(shí)間。但這真的很難,因?yàn)槟悴粌H會(huì)想:‘天哪,我身上發(fā)生了可怕的事情。’而且這還是母親造就的。父母應(yīng)該保護(hù)你,即使這么做可能出于善意,或者有她的理由,但這并不能成為借口。父母不應(yīng)該這樣對(duì)待自己的孩子?!?/p>
特殊的困境
處于這種境地的人面臨著特殊的困境:要么舉報(bào)父母犯罪,要么為父母的欺詐性消費(fèi)負(fù)責(zé)。
在2021年的一篇文章中,CyberScout的創(chuàng)始人及身份盜竊專家亞當(dāng)·萊文把家庭內(nèi)部欺詐稱為“隱匿性”犯罪,但他表示,這種犯罪實(shí)施起來(lái)“一點(diǎn)都不困難”。
他建議道:“盡管這可能很難,但受害者應(yīng)該像應(yīng)對(duì)陌生人犯下的罪行一樣應(yīng)對(duì)這種犯罪。對(duì)你的信用卡設(shè)置90天的欺詐警報(bào),立即向警方報(bào)案,并對(duì)所有欺詐賬戶和費(fèi)用提出異議。凍結(jié)你在三家信用報(bào)告機(jī)構(gòu)的信用貸款?!?/p>
最后,這位向《財(cái)富》雜志講述自己母親盜用自己身份的女士說(shuō),她覺(jué)得自己別無(wú)選擇,只能向當(dāng)局舉報(bào)自己的母親。
她解釋道:“除非我向警方報(bào)案,否則征信機(jī)構(gòu)不會(huì)認(rèn)真對(duì)待我。我不想這么做,因?yàn)槟鞘俏夷赣H,我不知道他們會(huì)(對(duì)她)做什么。最終,他們什么也沒(méi)有做?!?/p>
在身份盜竊案發(fā)生數(shù)年后,她與母親重歸于好。但她表示,她們之間的關(guān)系出現(xiàn)了無(wú)法彌補(bǔ)的裂痕。
“我們有很長(zhǎng)一段時(shí)間沒(méi)有說(shuō)話,而且,我很受傷。但我想原諒她并迎接新生活?!彼f(shuō)?!皻w根結(jié)底,如果你的家人傷害了你,你就需要盡自己所能保護(hù)自己。所以,我們一直保持聯(lián)系,但我有自己的原則,保證我對(duì)我們?cè)谝黄鸬臅r(shí)間和交談的次數(shù)感到舒適?!?/p>
數(shù)字安全公司 Aura 的拉維錢(qián)德蘭(他的一個(gè)朋友在很小的時(shí)候就被親戚盜用了身份)認(rèn)為,當(dāng)局應(yīng)該采取更多的措施來(lái)防止兒童身份被盜。
拉維錢(qián)德蘭告訴《財(cái)富》雜志:“我一直不明白的是,為什么人們的信用默認(rèn)是開(kāi)放的,然后你必須[主動(dòng)]進(jìn)行關(guān)閉、凍結(jié)或鎖定。在我看來(lái),情況應(yīng)該恰恰相反。監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)和政府可以在這些方面參與進(jìn)來(lái),即在默認(rèn)情況下,每個(gè)人的信用和個(gè)人資料都處于鎖定狀態(tài)?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
當(dāng)阿克斯頓·貝茨-漢密爾頓在大學(xué)里第一次支付水電費(fèi)賬單時(shí),她很快就意識(shí)到事情極其不對(duì)勁。
事實(shí)證明,她是身份盜用的受害者——這導(dǎo)致她信用破產(chǎn)。
2001年,當(dāng)貝茨-漢密爾頓還是一名19歲的學(xué)生時(shí),新公用事業(yè)公司以她的信用評(píng)分低為由,要求她繳納100美元的保證金才能開(kāi)通服務(wù)。
她對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“我以為是因?yàn)樽约盒庞迷u(píng)分不夠?!钡芎?,當(dāng)她的信箱里出現(xiàn)了一份信用報(bào)告副本時(shí),她才知道事實(shí)恰恰相反。
“起初,我認(rèn)為信用報(bào)告一定附有很多說(shuō)明,因?yàn)槲业男庞脠?bào)告不應(yīng)該這么厚。應(yīng)該只有半頁(yè)紙的內(nèi)容——姓名、地址和幾筆學(xué)生貸款。我打開(kāi)一看,意識(shí)到信用報(bào)告并沒(méi)有附帶很多說(shuō)明,但我的信用報(bào)告卻長(zhǎng)達(dá)10頁(yè),里面全是欺詐性的信用卡記錄。”
其中一些記錄可以追溯到1993年,當(dāng)時(shí)她11歲。當(dāng)她向征信機(jī)構(gòu)提出異議時(shí),部分記錄被刪除了,僅僅是因?yàn)槟承﹤鶛?quán)人破產(chǎn)了。然而,還有一些記錄直到過(guò)了年限才被從她的歷史記錄中刪除——這通常需要七年左右的時(shí)間。
對(duì)大多數(shù)人來(lái)說(shuō),身份盜竊會(huì)讓人聯(lián)想到匿名的、從事非法活動(dòng)的黑客。但對(duì)包括貝茨-漢密爾頓在內(nèi)的許多受害者而言,罪魁禍?zhǔn)自诟咏业牡胤健?/p>
在貝茨-漢密爾頓的案例中,罪魁禍?zhǔn)资撬哪赣H。
普遍存在的問(wèn)題
貝茲-漢密爾頓在20世紀(jì)90年代成為兒童身份盜竊的受害者,但這種犯罪在今天仍然很普遍。
卡內(nèi)基梅隆大學(xué)(Carnegie Mellon)的CyLab在2011年進(jìn)行的一項(xiàng)具有里程碑意義的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),兒童因?yàn)樘厥庠蚋菀壮蔀樯矸荼I竊的受害者。
在對(duì)4萬(wàn)多名美國(guó)兒童的分析中,該大學(xué)的研究人員發(fā)現(xiàn),10%的兒童的社會(huì)安全號(hào)碼被他人盜用。這意味著兒童成為身份盜竊受害者的可能性是成年人的51倍。
報(bào)告的作者稱,兒童的身份被用來(lái)購(gòu)買(mǎi)房屋和汽車(chē)、辦理信用卡和獲得就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì),他們?cè)诜治隼锇l(fā)現(xiàn)的最小的受害者只有五個(gè)月大。
與此同時(shí),Javelin Strategy公司在2021年的一項(xiàng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn),每年每50名美國(guó)兒童中就有一人成為身份盜竊的受害者,其中73%的受害者成為他們熟識(shí)的人的目標(biāo)。
數(shù)字安全公司Aura的首席執(zhí)行官及創(chuàng)始人哈里·拉維錢(qián)德蘭告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,兒童身份盜竊案的犯罪者“通?!迸c受害者有親戚關(guān)系。
他說(shuō):“很多時(shí)候,涉及的家庭都處于水深火熱之中,他們面臨著嚴(yán)重的財(cái)務(wù)危機(jī)或成癮問(wèn)題。當(dāng)孩子出生時(shí),他們會(huì)得到一個(gè)社會(huì)安全號(hào)碼,這個(gè)號(hào)碼直到孩子大約17歲或18歲才會(huì)使用,因此能夠在很長(zhǎng)的時(shí)間內(nèi)使用這樣一個(gè)無(wú)不良信用記錄的社會(huì)安全號(hào)碼?!?/p>
真的是媽媽盜用了身份嗎?
直到她的母親于2013年去世后,貝茨-漢密爾頓才終于意識(shí)到誰(shuí)是導(dǎo)致她陷入經(jīng)濟(jì)困境的欺詐行為的幕后黑手。母親去世幾周后,她接到了父親打來(lái)的一個(gè)改變她一生的電話。
她說(shuō):“他在翻看(我媽媽的舊物)時(shí),拿出一張我名下的信用卡的賬單。他準(zhǔn)備劈頭蓋臉訓(xùn)斥我——對(duì)我大吼大叫,因?yàn)槲以?001年透支了信用卡?!?/p>
隨著談話的深入,貝茨-漢密爾頓意識(shí)到,母親就是用那張以她的名義開(kāi)具的信用卡騙取貸款的(這只是其中一項(xiàng)貸款)。在她母親的檔案里進(jìn)一步發(fā)現(xiàn)的證據(jù)證明,她母親是這一切的始作俑者——而且還發(fā)現(xiàn),她不僅對(duì)女兒的身份盜竊負(fù)有責(zé)任,還對(duì)以貝茨-漢密爾頓的父親和祖父的名義進(jìn)行的欺詐負(fù)有責(zé)任。
貝茨-漢密爾頓對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“發(fā)現(xiàn)真相的那一刻,就像感受到了兩種極端的情緒。作為一個(gè)在身份盜用陰影中生活了20年,卻不知道誰(shuí)是罪魁禍?zhǔn)椎娜?,?dāng)時(shí)的感覺(jué)就像,哇,我們終于知道誰(shuí)是始作俑者了,我們?cè)僖膊挥眠@樣生活了——但后來(lái)又想:真的是媽媽盜用了身份嗎?答案是肯定的?!?/p>
貝茨-漢密爾頓還沒(méi)來(lái)得及為自己建立信用,就被她媽媽的欺詐行為拖累,信用分?jǐn)?shù)降到了380分。
在美國(guó),F(xiàn)ICO信用評(píng)分——最常用的信用評(píng)分——介于300分到850分之間,700分或以上通常被貸款機(jī)構(gòu)視為“信用良好”。根據(jù)益博睿(Experian)的數(shù)據(jù),去年美國(guó)人的平均FICO信用評(píng)分為714分。
信用評(píng)分是貸款機(jī)構(gòu)用來(lái)判斷某人是否有能力償還貸款的指標(biāo),因此在貸款和信用卡等債務(wù)方面非常重要。甚至房東有時(shí)也會(huì)在同意租房之前要求查看潛在租戶的信用評(píng)分,如果評(píng)分較低,即低于600分左右,可能就會(huì)給潛在租戶造成困難。
2001年,貝茨-漢密爾頓的不良信用報(bào)告使她在美國(guó)的所有信用評(píng)分中處于第50百分位數(shù)。她告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,她花了大量的時(shí)間和金錢(qián)來(lái)扭轉(zhuǎn)這種局面。
她說(shuō):“首先,我從一家利率很高的次級(jí)貸款機(jī)構(gòu)申請(qǐng)了一張信用卡……[而且]額度只有300美元。我的第一筆車(chē)貸用來(lái)購(gòu)買(mǎi)一輛用了五年的二手車(chē),年利率為18.23%,這就像用信用卡買(mǎi)了一輛二手車(chē)一樣?!?/p>
在她母親去世時(shí),貝茨-漢密爾頓的信用報(bào)告已經(jīng)清除了欺詐記錄。但她指出,她的母親“絕對(duì)”意識(shí)到身份盜竊給女兒造成了多大的經(jīng)濟(jì)損失。
貝茨-漢密爾頓解釋道:“是我告訴她事情有多嚴(yán)重的。她是我第一個(gè)求助的人,因?yàn)樗诮鹑诜?wù)部門(mén)工作,還是家里的理財(cái)專家。”
總部位于華盛頓特區(qū)的律師事務(wù)所Cohen & Cohen的創(chuàng)始人及執(zhí)行合伙人韋恩·R·科恩對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示,這種犯罪背后的“主要?jiǎng)訖C(jī)”是父母信用不良,無(wú)法進(jìn)行在債務(wù)基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行消費(fèi)。
他說(shuō):“在大多數(shù)州,這是一種罪行——欺詐罪、身份盜竊罪和挪用資金罪都是檢察官可能提出指控的罪名。”
當(dāng)談到貝茨-漢密爾頓的母親犯罪的動(dòng)機(jī)時(shí),貝茨-漢密爾頓永遠(yuǎn)無(wú)法確定,因?yàn)樗龔膩?lái)沒(méi)有機(jī)會(huì)與母親當(dāng)面對(duì)質(zhì)。但通過(guò)與認(rèn)識(shí)她母親的人的交談以及她自己的反思,她有了一些想法。
她說(shuō):“我的外婆顯然和我媽媽非常相似,她會(huì)強(qiáng)迫性購(gòu)物。這種消費(fèi)[歸結(jié)為需要]擁有最豪華的東西,并根據(jù)你穿什么樣的衣服,開(kāi)什么樣的車(chē),讓別人對(duì)你的良好經(jīng)濟(jì)條件印象深刻。”
“你信任自己的父母”
許多被父母?jìng)Φ娜嗽谏缃幻襟w上分享了他們的故事。
“我18歲時(shí)拿到的第一份信用報(bào)告上有1999年的燃?xì)赓M(fèi)賬單,而我出生于1989年?!币粋€(gè)人在X平臺(tái)上發(fā)帖說(shuō),“我很感激他們?cè)试S我只用出生證明就提出異議,而不是提交一份針對(duì)自己家人的報(bào)案證明。但那可能是因?yàn)槲耶?dāng)時(shí)正在試圖獲得安全許可,而當(dāng)權(quán)派操之過(guò)急?!?/p>
“我媽媽就是這么做的,[我]成年后一直在償還根本不屬于我的債務(wù)。”另一個(gè)人說(shuō)。還有一個(gè)人說(shuō),在她的父母使用她的個(gè)人資料進(jìn)行貸款后,她直到30多歲才讓自己的信用評(píng)分穩(wěn)定下來(lái)。
《財(cái)富》雜志無(wú)法獨(dú)立驗(yàn)證這些軼事。
一位居住在西雅圖、現(xiàn)年27歲的女性在很小的時(shí)候就成了家庭身份盜竊的受害者。她向《財(cái)富》匿名講述了自己的經(jīng)歷。
當(dāng)她在華盛頓大學(xué)(University of Washington)讀大三的時(shí)候,母親鼓勵(lì)她申請(qǐng)第一張信用卡。
她告訴《財(cái)富》雜志:“你相信自己的父母,尤其是母親——你認(rèn)為他們會(huì)保護(hù)你。我想,的確,你顯然比我更了解信貸。但我想她當(dāng)時(shí)會(huì)覺(jué)得:‘哦,這真的易如反掌。’”
她母親說(shuō)服她開(kāi)了第二張額度更高的信用卡,并承諾為她保管好這張信用卡。但隨著時(shí)間的推移,她發(fā)現(xiàn)信用卡上的債務(wù)越來(lái)越多,而且沒(méi)有及時(shí)還清。
她說(shuō),盡管她對(duì)自己的財(cái)務(wù)狀況感到害怕,但她不敢和母親當(dāng)面對(duì)質(zhì)。
“母親是我唯一的撫養(yǎng)人之一——我想如果我把這件事情告訴她,她就會(huì)報(bào)復(fù)我,不供我讀完大學(xué),這確實(shí)會(huì)毀了我們之間的關(guān)系?!彼忉尩??!暗ó?dāng))我查看自己的信用評(píng)分時(shí),卻發(fā)現(xiàn)情況非常糟糕。(她)讓我信用破產(chǎn)?!?/p>
她說(shuō),她最終鼓起勇氣和母親談了母親使用她的信用卡的問(wèn)題。
她對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“情況并不樂(lè)觀。我和她斷絕關(guān)系很長(zhǎng)時(shí)間。但這真的很難,因?yàn)槟悴粌H會(huì)想:‘天哪,我身上發(fā)生了可怕的事情?!疫@還是母親造就的。父母應(yīng)該保護(hù)你,即使這么做可能出于善意,或者有她的理由,但這并不能成為借口。父母不應(yīng)該這樣對(duì)待自己的孩子?!?/p>
特殊的困境
處于這種境地的人面臨著特殊的困境:要么舉報(bào)父母犯罪,要么為父母的欺詐性消費(fèi)負(fù)責(zé)。
在2021年的一篇文章中,CyberScout的創(chuàng)始人及身份盜竊專家亞當(dāng)·萊文把家庭內(nèi)部欺詐稱為“隱匿性”犯罪,但他表示,這種犯罪實(shí)施起來(lái)“一點(diǎn)都不困難”。
他建議道:“盡管這可能很難,但受害者應(yīng)該像應(yīng)對(duì)陌生人犯下的罪行一樣應(yīng)對(duì)這種犯罪。對(duì)你的信用卡設(shè)置90天的欺詐警報(bào),立即向警方報(bào)案,并對(duì)所有欺詐賬戶和費(fèi)用提出異議。凍結(jié)你在三家信用報(bào)告機(jī)構(gòu)的信用貸款。”
最后,這位向《財(cái)富》雜志講述自己母親盜用自己身份的女士說(shuō),她覺(jué)得自己別無(wú)選擇,只能向當(dāng)局舉報(bào)自己的母親。
她解釋道:“除非我向警方報(bào)案,否則征信機(jī)構(gòu)不會(huì)認(rèn)真對(duì)待我。我不想這么做,因?yàn)槟鞘俏夷赣H,我不知道他們會(huì)(對(duì)她)做什么。最終,他們什么也沒(méi)有做?!?/p>
在身份盜竊案發(fā)生數(shù)年后,她與母親重歸于好。但她表示,她們之間的關(guān)系出現(xiàn)了無(wú)法彌補(bǔ)的裂痕。
“我們有很長(zhǎng)一段時(shí)間沒(méi)有說(shuō)話,而且,我很受傷。但我想原諒她并迎接新生活?!彼f(shuō)?!皻w根結(jié)底,如果你的家人傷害了你,你就需要盡自己所能保護(hù)自己。所以,我們一直保持聯(lián)系,但我有自己的原則,保證我對(duì)我們?cè)谝黄鸬臅r(shí)間和交談的次數(shù)感到舒適。”
數(shù)字安全公司 Aura 的拉維錢(qián)德蘭(他的一個(gè)朋友在很小的時(shí)候就被親戚盜用了身份)認(rèn)為,當(dāng)局應(yīng)該采取更多的措施來(lái)防止兒童身份被盜。
拉維錢(qián)德蘭告訴《財(cái)富》雜志:“我一直不明白的是,為什么人們的信用默認(rèn)是開(kāi)放的,然后你必須[主動(dòng)]進(jìn)行關(guān)閉、凍結(jié)或鎖定。在我看來(lái),情況應(yīng)該恰恰相反。監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)和政府可以在這些方面參與進(jìn)來(lái),即在默認(rèn)情況下,每個(gè)人的信用和個(gè)人資料都處于鎖定狀態(tài)。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
When Axton Betz-Hamilton set up her first utility bill at college, she soon realized something was very, very wrong.
It turned out she’d been a victim of identity theft—and it had destroyed her credit rating.
In 2001, when she was a 19-year-old student, Betz-Hamilton’s new utility provider demanded a $100 security deposit to turn on her service, citing her credit score.
“I thought it was because I didn’t have enough credit,” she told Fortune. But when a copy of her credit report turned up in her mailbox six weeks later, she learned the opposite was true.
“At first, I thought credit reports must come with a lot of instructions, because my credit report should not have been thick. It should have been half a page—name, address, and a couple of student loans. I opened it and realized very quickly that credit reports do not come with a lot of instructions, but that mine was 10 pages long and full of fraudulent credit card entries.”
Some of those entries dated back to 1993, when she was 11. When she disputed the file with credit bureaus, parts were removed simply because certain creditors had gone out of business. Others, however, didn’t get scrubbed from her history until they aged off—which typically takes around seven years.
For most people, the idea of identity theft conjures images of anonymous, shady hackers. But for many victims—including Betz-Hamilton—the perpetrator is much closer to home.
In Betz-Hamilton’s case, it was her mother.
A widespread problem
Betz-Hamilton fell victim to child identity theft in the 1990s—but the crime is still widespread today.
A landmark 2011 study by Carnegie Mellon CyLab found that children are uniquely vulnerable to identity theft.
In their analysis of more than 40,000 American children, researchers at the university found that 10% had someone else using their Social Security number. That meant kids were 51 times more likely to fall victim to identity theft than adults.
Children’s identities were being used to buy homes and cars, open credit card accounts and secure employment, the report’s authors said, with the youngest victim they discovered in their analysis being just five months old.
Meanwhile, a 2021 study by Javelin Strategy found that one in 50 U.S. children fall victim to identity theft every year—with 73% of victims being targeted by someone they know personally.
Hari Ravichandran, CEO and founder of digital security firm Aura, told Fortune that the perpetrator in a child identity theft case is “very often” related to the victim.
“A lot of the time, it involves families that are in dire straits, where they’re facing something like a serious economic crunch or addiction issues,” he said. “When kids are born, they get a social security number that generally never gets used until they’re about 17 or 18—so there’s this large window of time where there’s a clean social security number available.”
“It’s mom, really?”
It was only after her mother passed away in 2013 that Betz-Hamilton finally realized who was behind the fraud that landed her in financial difficulty. A couple weeks after her mom’s death, she got a life-changing call from her dad.
“He was going through [my mom’s old things] and pulled out a credit card statement in my name,” she said. “He was ready to tear into me—he was yelling at me for taking a credit card over its limit back in 2001.”
As the conversation progressed, Betz-Hamilton realized that the credit card in question was one of the debts that had been fraudulently taken out in her name. Further discoveries made among her mom’s files proved her mom had been the perpetrator of all of it—and revealed that she was not only guilty of her daughter’s identity theft, but of fraud committed in Betz-Hamilton’s dad and grandfather’s names.
“That moment of discovery, it was like experiencing two extreme emotions,” Betz-Hamilton told Fortune. “As someone who’d been living with identity theft for 20 years and not knowing who was responsible, it was like, wow, we figured out who did it finally, and we don’t have to live like this anymore—but then it’s like: it’s mom, really? It’s mom.”
The fraud her mom had committed dragged Betz-Hamilton’s credit score down to 380 before she’d even had a chance to build any credit for herself.
In the U.S., FICO Scores—the most commonly used credit scores—sit between 300 and 850, with a rating of 700 or above generally deemed “good” by lenders. According to Experian, the average American had a FICO Score of 714 last year.
Credit scores are used by lenders to determine whether someone is likely to pay them back, and are therefore hugely significant when it comes to taking out debt like loans and credit cards. Even landlords sometimes ask to see potential tenants’ credit scores before agreeing to rent them an apartment, and having a poor rating—that is, one below around 600—could make things difficult for would-be renters.
Betz-Hamilton’s damaged credit report landed her in the second percentile of all credit scores in the U.S. back in 2001. It took her a lot of time and money to remedy the situation, she told Fortune.
“I started by getting a credit card from a subprime lender that had an exorbitant interest rate…[and] it had a $300 limit.,” she said. “My first car loan on a five-year-old used car had APR 18.23% interest—that’s like putting a used car on a credit card.”
By the time her mom passed away, Betz-Hamilton’s credit report had been cleared of fraudulent entries. But she said her mother had “absolutely” been aware of just how financially damaging the identity theft had been.
“I’m the one who told her how bad it was,” Betz-Hamilton explained. “She was the first person I called for help because she worked in financial services. She was the financial expert in the family.”
Wayne R. Cohen, founder and managing partner of Washington, D.C.-based law firm Cohen & Cohen, told Fortune the “chief motivation” behind the crime was when a parent has bad credit and is not able to make a debt-based purchase.
“In most states this is a crime—fraud, identify theft, and misappropriation of funds are all possible charges a prosecutor could bring,” he said.
When it comes to what motivated Betz-Hamilton’s mom to commit her crimes, Betz-Hamilton can never know for sure as she never got the chance to confront her. But through conversations with people who knew her mom and her own reflections, she has a few ideas.
“My grandmother was very similar, apparently, to my mom, in that she would compulsively spend,” she said. “That spending [came down to a need to] have the nicest things and impress other people with their perception of your wealth, based on the kind of clothes you have the kind of car you drive.”
“You trust your parents”
A number of people who were victimized by their parents have shared their stories on social media.
“First credit report I pulled at 18 had a gas bill from 1999. I was born in 89,” one person said in a post on X. “Was very thankful they allowed me to dispute simply using my birth certificate instead of doing a police report against my own family. But that was probably because I was trying to get a security clearance and the powers that be rushed things.”
“My mom did this, whole adult life [I’ve] been paying off debt that wasn’t even mine,” another said, while another said it had taken her until her thirties to stabilize her credit score after her parents used her details.
Fortune was not able to independently verify those anecdotes.
One Seattle-based woman, who is now 27, became a victim of family identity theft at a young age. She spoke to Fortune anonymously about her own experience.
When she was a junior at the University of Washington, her mother encouraged her to apply for her first credit card.
“You trust your parents, especially your mom—you think they’re there to protect you,” she told Fortune. “I thought, sure, you’re obviously more knowledgeable about credit than me. But I think she then felt like, ‘oh, that was really easy.’”
Her mom convinced her to open up a second credit card with a higher spending limit, which she promised to keep safe for her. But over time, she realized debts were being racked up on the cards that weren’t being paid off when they should have been.
She said she was afraid to confront her mother despite feeling scared about her financial situation.
“My mom was one of my sole providers—I thought if I brought this up to her that she’d retaliate and not help me through college, and that this was really going to ruin our relationship,” she explained. “But [when] I checked my credit score, it was pretty bad. [She] totally trashed my credit.”
She said she eventually mustered up the strength to talk to her mom about her use of her credit cards.
“It didn’t go great,” she told Fortune. “I halted my relationship with her for a long time. But it was really hard because you’re not only thinking, ‘oh my gosh, something horrible is happening to me,’ but it’s my mom of all people. Your parents are supposed to protect you, and even though there may have been some good intent behind it, or she had her reasonings, it doesn’t excuse it. That’s not what a parent should be doing to their children.”
Unique dilemma
People in this position face a unique dilemma: report their parents for committing a crime, or be held responsible for their parent’s fraudulent spending.
In a 2021 article, CyberScout founder and identity theft expert Adam Levin labeled intrafamily fraud an “insidious” crime, but said it was one that could be carried out “with no difficulty at all.”
“As hard as it may be, victims should respond to the crime exactly as they would had it been perpetrated by a stranger,” he advised. “Place a 90-day fraud alert on your credit, file a police report immediately, and dispute all fraudulent accounts and charges. Freeze your credit at the three credit reporting agencies.”
Ultimately, the woman who told Fortune about her mother stealing her identity said felt she had little choice but to report her mother to the authorities.
“The credit bureaus wouldn’t take me seriously unless I filed a police report,” she explained. “I didn’t want to because it was my mom, I didn’t know what they would do [to her]. Ultimately, they didn’t do anything.”
Several years after the identity theft, she is back on speaking terms with her mother. But she says their relationship has been irreparably damaged.
“We didn’t talk for a long time, and I was very hurt. But I wanted to forgive and move on,” she said. “Ultimately, if your family is hurting you, you need to do whatever you can to protect yourself. So, we’re in contact, but I have my own parameters that make me feel comfortable with how much we’re together or how much we talk.”
Ravichandran of the digital security firm Aura—who has a friend whose identity was stolen by a relative when they were younger—argues that authorities should do more to prevent child identity theft.
“What’s never been clear to me is why somebody’s credit should be open, by default, and then you have to [actively] close it, or freeze it or lock it,” Ravichandran told Fortune. “To me, it seems like it ought to be the opposite. And that’s something that regulators and government could get involved with, which is make everybody’s credit and personal info locked by default.”