2023年,即使面臨激進(jìn)加息,美國經(jīng)濟(jì)依舊表現(xiàn)得相對強(qiáng)勁,因此許多之前持悲觀態(tài)度的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家和華爾街巨頭紛紛修改了對美國經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的預(yù)測。過去兩年,他們一直警告美國即將迎來經(jīng)濟(jì)崩潰,但現(xiàn)在他們認(rèn)為,美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)(Federal Reserve)終究有可能在不影響就業(yè)的情況下控制通脹。獨(dú)立經(jīng)濟(jì)咨詢公司牛津經(jīng)濟(jì)研究院(Oxford Economics)的首席美國經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家奧倫·克拉奇金卻并不認(rèn)同這種樂觀的前景預(yù)測。
他在8月22日發(fā)布的一份報(bào)告中說:“有些人在基準(zhǔn)情景里預(yù)測美國不會(huì)發(fā)生經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退。但我們依舊認(rèn)為,加息、美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)限制性的政策和嚴(yán)格的貸款標(biāo)準(zhǔn),會(huì)導(dǎo)致美國在2023年的晚些時(shí)候陷入輕度衰退?!?/p>
克拉奇金承認(rèn)他的預(yù)測存在一些風(fēng)險(xiǎn),他特別提到了美國經(jīng)濟(jì)在新冠疫情之后的復(fù)蘇勢頭令人印象深刻。但隨著消費(fèi)者快速花光在新冠疫情期間的儲(chǔ)蓄和公司放慢招聘速度,克拉奇金依然認(rèn)為美國會(huì)陷入“輕度衰退”。
然而,他還指出,如何定義衰退至關(guān)重要。美國國家經(jīng)濟(jì)研究局(National Bureau of Economic Research)對經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的定義是連續(xù)兩個(gè)季度國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值(GDP)負(fù)增長,并且“經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)整體上顯著減少,且持續(xù)數(shù)月”。
克拉奇金解釋道:“一些行業(yè)表現(xiàn)糟糕,而有些行業(yè)依舊繁榮,因此經(jīng)濟(jì)數(shù)據(jù)可能并不符合美國國家經(jīng)濟(jì)研究局對經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的傳統(tǒng)定義。美國是否陷入經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退由該部門判定。”
經(jīng)過新冠疫情期間數(shù)年的封鎖和出行限制后,美國人恢復(fù)乘飛機(jī)出行和外出就餐,希望彌補(bǔ)錯(cuò)過的那些時(shí)間。人們消費(fèi)習(xí)慣的快速轉(zhuǎn)變幫助旅游、休閑等服務(wù)業(yè)繁榮發(fā)展,但從事商品銷售的行業(yè)卻陷入困境,例如制造業(yè)和建筑業(yè)等。
克拉奇金寫道,如果這種狀況持續(xù)下去,“美國經(jīng)濟(jì)不會(huì)陷入典型的衰退,而是會(huì)陷入或者說實(shí)際上已經(jīng)陷入了‘滾動(dòng)式’衰退”。
滾動(dòng)式衰退是指有些行業(yè)萎縮并且出現(xiàn)失業(yè),而有些行業(yè)卻持續(xù)增長,因此國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值整體維持正增長,只是增幅低于歷史水平。
并非只有克拉奇金一個(gè)人預(yù)測美國經(jīng)濟(jì)陷入滾動(dòng)式衰退。Yardeni Research的創(chuàng)始人埃德·亞德尼幾個(gè)月來一直認(rèn)為,從房地產(chǎn)到制造業(yè)等利率敏感性行業(yè)已經(jīng)陷入了滾動(dòng)式衰退,而醫(yī)療、教育等對利率較不敏感的行業(yè)卻持續(xù)增長。
但有一些更樂觀的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家認(rèn)為美國經(jīng)濟(jì)能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)軟著陸,比如穆迪(Moody’s)的馬克·贊迪。贊迪在今年夏天早些時(shí)候表示,較輕的家庭債務(wù)負(fù)擔(dān)以及穩(wěn)定的油價(jià)和通脹預(yù)期,應(yīng)該可以幫助美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)在不增加失業(yè)的情況下控制通脹。
但克拉奇金依舊提到了牛津經(jīng)濟(jì)研究院新開發(fā)的行業(yè)“商業(yè)周期指標(biāo)”(Business Cycle Indicators)模型,以證明美國經(jīng)濟(jì)陷入了滾動(dòng)式經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退。該模型衡量各個(gè)行業(yè)的擴(kuò)張或收縮情況。
模型顯示,由于強(qiáng)勁的休閑餐旅業(yè)消費(fèi)、收入增長和商業(yè)投資增加,服務(wù)業(yè)目前處于“穩(wěn)健增長的趨勢”。然而,在商品生產(chǎn)行業(yè),包括制造業(yè)和建筑業(yè)等,情況卻截然不同。
圖片來源:OXFORD ECONOMICS
克拉奇金寫道:“我們的商業(yè)周期指標(biāo)顯示商品制造行業(yè)面臨困境。由于商品需求遠(yuǎn)低于與疫情相關(guān)的最高峰,公司開始謹(jǐn)慎管理庫存,利率位于多年最高水平,而且企業(yè)和消費(fèi)者的信貸流動(dòng)自由度受限,因此制造業(yè)的商業(yè)周期指數(shù)發(fā)出令人沮喪的信號,這并不意外?!?/p>
牛津經(jīng)濟(jì)研究院認(rèn)為,制造業(yè)、建筑業(yè)和其他商品制造行業(yè)已經(jīng)陷入衰退??死娼鹁?,隨著美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)加息,如果美國經(jīng)濟(jì)整體上真正陷入衰退,“歷史證明商品制造行業(yè)的產(chǎn)值和就業(yè)通常會(huì)蒙受更大的損失?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
2023年8月21日,紐約證券交易所(New York Stock Exchange)。
2023年,即使面臨激進(jìn)加息,美國經(jīng)濟(jì)依舊表現(xiàn)得相對強(qiáng)勁,因此許多之前持悲觀態(tài)度的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家和華爾街巨頭紛紛修改了對美國經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的預(yù)測。過去兩年,他們一直警告美國即將迎來經(jīng)濟(jì)崩潰,但現(xiàn)在他們認(rèn)為,美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)(Federal Reserve)終究有可能在不影響就業(yè)的情況下控制通脹。獨(dú)立經(jīng)濟(jì)咨詢公司牛津經(jīng)濟(jì)研究院(Oxford Economics)的首席美國經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家奧倫·克拉奇金卻并不認(rèn)同這種樂觀的前景預(yù)測。
他在8月22日發(fā)布的一份報(bào)告中說:“有些人在基準(zhǔn)情景里預(yù)測美國不會(huì)發(fā)生經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退。但我們依舊認(rèn)為,加息、美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)限制性的政策和嚴(yán)格的貸款標(biāo)準(zhǔn),會(huì)導(dǎo)致美國在2023年的晚些時(shí)候陷入輕度衰退?!?/p>
克拉奇金承認(rèn)他的預(yù)測存在一些風(fēng)險(xiǎn),他特別提到了美國經(jīng)濟(jì)在新冠疫情之后的復(fù)蘇勢頭令人印象深刻。但隨著消費(fèi)者快速花光在新冠疫情期間的儲(chǔ)蓄和公司放慢招聘速度,克拉奇金依然認(rèn)為美國會(huì)陷入“輕度衰退”。
然而,他還指出,如何定義衰退至關(guān)重要。美國國家經(jīng)濟(jì)研究局(National Bureau of Economic Research)對經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的定義是連續(xù)兩個(gè)季度國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值(GDP)負(fù)增長,并且“經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)整體上顯著減少,且持續(xù)數(shù)月”。
克拉奇金解釋道:“一些行業(yè)表現(xiàn)糟糕,而有些行業(yè)依舊繁榮,因此經(jīng)濟(jì)數(shù)據(jù)可能并不符合美國國家經(jīng)濟(jì)研究局對經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的傳統(tǒng)定義。美國是否陷入經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退由該部門判定?!?/p>
經(jīng)過新冠疫情期間數(shù)年的封鎖和出行限制后,美國人恢復(fù)乘飛機(jī)出行和外出就餐,希望彌補(bǔ)錯(cuò)過的那些時(shí)間。人們消費(fèi)習(xí)慣的快速轉(zhuǎn)變幫助旅游、休閑等服務(wù)業(yè)繁榮發(fā)展,但從事商品銷售的行業(yè)卻陷入困境,例如制造業(yè)和建筑業(yè)等。
克拉奇金寫道,如果這種狀況持續(xù)下去,“美國經(jīng)濟(jì)不會(huì)陷入典型的衰退,而是會(huì)陷入或者說實(shí)際上已經(jīng)陷入了‘滾動(dòng)式’衰退”。
滾動(dòng)式衰退是指有些行業(yè)萎縮并且出現(xiàn)失業(yè),而有些行業(yè)卻持續(xù)增長,因此國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值整體維持正增長,只是增幅低于歷史水平。
并非只有克拉奇金一個(gè)人預(yù)測美國經(jīng)濟(jì)陷入滾動(dòng)式衰退。Yardeni Research的創(chuàng)始人埃德·亞德尼幾個(gè)月來一直認(rèn)為,從房地產(chǎn)到制造業(yè)等利率敏感性行業(yè)已經(jīng)陷入了滾動(dòng)式衰退,而醫(yī)療、教育等對利率較不敏感的行業(yè)卻持續(xù)增長。
但有一些更樂觀的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家認(rèn)為美國經(jīng)濟(jì)能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)軟著陸,比如穆迪(Moody’s)的馬克·贊迪。贊迪在今年夏天早些時(shí)候表示,較輕的家庭債務(wù)負(fù)擔(dān)以及穩(wěn)定的油價(jià)和通脹預(yù)期,應(yīng)該可以幫助美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)在不增加失業(yè)的情況下控制通脹。
但克拉奇金依舊提到了牛津經(jīng)濟(jì)研究院新開發(fā)的行業(yè)“商業(yè)周期指標(biāo)”(Business Cycle Indicators)模型,以證明美國經(jīng)濟(jì)陷入了滾動(dòng)式經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退。該模型衡量各個(gè)行業(yè)的擴(kuò)張或收縮情況。
模型顯示,由于強(qiáng)勁的休閑餐旅業(yè)消費(fèi)、收入增長和商業(yè)投資增加,服務(wù)業(yè)目前處于“穩(wěn)健增長的趨勢”。然而,在商品生產(chǎn)行業(yè),包括制造業(yè)和建筑業(yè)等,情況卻截然不同。
圖表1:服務(wù)業(yè)增長,制造業(yè)低迷,建筑業(yè)陷入困境
美國:行業(yè)商業(yè)周期跟蹤器 - 最新解讀
商業(yè)周期高峰
服務(wù)業(yè)
美國行業(yè)商業(yè)周期指標(biāo)
耐用消費(fèi)品制造
非耐用消費(fèi)品制造
建筑業(yè)
商業(yè)周期低谷
資料來源:Oxford Economics/Haver Analytics
克拉奇金寫道:“我們的商業(yè)周期指標(biāo)顯示商品制造行業(yè)面臨困境。由于商品需求遠(yuǎn)低于與疫情相關(guān)的最高峰,公司開始謹(jǐn)慎管理庫存,利率位于多年最高水平,而且企業(yè)和消費(fèi)者的信貸流動(dòng)自由度受限,因此制造業(yè)的商業(yè)周期指數(shù)發(fā)出令人沮喪的信號,這并不意外?!?/p>
牛津經(jīng)濟(jì)研究院認(rèn)為,制造業(yè)、建筑業(yè)和其他商品制造行業(yè)已經(jīng)陷入衰退??死娼鹁妫S著美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)加息,如果美國經(jīng)濟(jì)整體上真正陷入衰退,“歷史證明商品制造行業(yè)的產(chǎn)值和就業(yè)通常會(huì)蒙受更大的損失?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
With the economy showing relative strength in 2023, even in the face of aggressive interest rate hikes, many previously bearish economists and Wall Street titans have flip-flopped on their predictions for a recession. The Federal Reserve may be able to tame inflation without sparking a job-killing recession after all, they now argue—after warning of impending economic doom for over two years. But Oren Klachkin, lead U.S. economist at the independent economics advisory firm Oxford Economics, doesn’t buy the new rosy outlook.
“Some forecasters are removing a U.S. recession from their baselines. But we continue to think that elevated interest rates, restrictive Fed policy, and tight lending standards will cause a mild recession in late 2023,” he wrote in a August 22 note.
Klachkin acknowledged some risks to his forecast, noting that the economy has impressively recovered from the pandemic. But with consumers quickly spending their COVID-era savings and businesses slowing hiring, the economist still believes a “mild recession” is coming.
However, Klachkin also noted that how you define a recession is important in this case. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) defines a recession as two consecutive quarters of negative gross domestic product (GDP) growth coupled with “a significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and lasts more than a few months.”
But “with some industries performing poorly and others remaining buoyant, it’s possible that the economic data won’t satisfy the traditional definition of recession used by the National Bureau of Economic Research – the arbiter of U.S. recessions,” Klachkin explained.
After years of COVID lockdowns and travel restrictions, Americans are back at airports and restaurants, looking to make up for lost time. Their rapid shift in spending habits has helped services sectors, like travel and leisure, thrive even as sectors that focus on selling goods, like manufacturing and construction, struggle.
If that continues: “Instead of a typical recession, it’s possible the economy will fall into – or in fact is already in – a ‘rolling’ recession,” Klachkin wrote.
A rolling recession is when some industries contract and suffer job losses, while others continue to grow, leaving the overall GDP growth positive, but low by historical standards.
Klachkin isn’t the only forecaster arguing a rolling recession is here. Ed Yardeni, founder of Yardeni Research, has argued for months that interest rate sensitive sectors, from housing to manufacturing, are already in a rolling recession, while other, less rate sensitive sectors, from healthcare to education, have managed to continue growing.
However, some more bullish economists, including Moody’s Mark Zandi, are betting on a soft landing. Zandi said earlier this summer that light household debt loads, stable oil prices, and anchored inflation expectations should help the Fed tame inflation without a subsequent rise in unemployment.
Still, Klachkin pointed to Oxford Economics’ newly-developed industry ‘Business Cycle Indicators’ model—which measures the expansion or contraction of individual sectors—to bolster the evidence that the rolling recession is underway.
The services sector is in a “robust trend,” according to the model, due to strong leisure and hospitality spending, income growth, and growing business investment. However, when it comes to the goods producing sectors, including manufacturing and construction, it’s a different story.
“Our BCIs for the goods-producing industries are suffering,” Klachkin wrote. “With goods demand far below its pandemic-related peak, companies prudently managing their inventories, interest rates at multiyear highs, and credit flowing less freely to businesses and consumers, it isn’t surprising that our manufacturing BCI is offering a gloomy signal.”
For the manufacturing, construction and other goods producing sectors, a downturn is already here, according to Oxford Economics. And if a true recession does hit the entire economy as the Fed hikes interest rates: “History shows that goods-producing industries typically suffer greater losses of output and jobs,” Klachkin warned.