有個好消息,也有個壞消息。好消息是新冠疫苗加強針確實有用,壞消息是效用可能逐漸減弱。
還要繼續(xù)打嗎?到底還要打多少次新冠疫苗?
2021年9月德爾塔變異毒株大舉侵襲期間,美國疾病控制與預防中心(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)曾經(jīng)宣布,只建議65歲以上或有基礎病的人群接種新冠疫苗。
6個月后,情況完全改變。2021年11月在南非首次發(fā)現(xiàn)的高傳染性奧密克戎變異毒株已經(jīng)在全世界迅速瘋狂傳播,歐美公共衛(wèi)生官員建議,所有成年人都應該接種加強針。
但只打加強針就夠了嗎?
美國疾病控制與預防中心的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,第三針可以有效防止奧密克戎病例住院,尤其是老年人。但是該中心的最近一項研究顯示,注射第三針加強針四個月后,免疫力可能會減弱。為了預防奧密克戎以及未來的變異毒株,會不會建議注射第四針,乃至第五針?
“新冠病毒造成了很多意料之外的狀況,每次我們對解決問題充滿信心。必要的話,我們得保持快速調(diào)整。”賓夕法尼亞大學免疫學研究所(Institute for Immunology at the University of Pennsylvania)的所長約翰·惠理告訴《財富》雜志。
在惠理看來,這意味著無論情況如何都要保留選擇,包括未來的加強針。
數(shù)據(jù)缺失
本次疫情和背后的新冠病毒讓所有科學家頭疼。很多情況我們還不了解。病毒起源何處?為什么一些人的癥狀比其他人重?為什么有這么多的無癥狀病例?當然還有,加強針能夠維持多久?
“可惜的是,目前數(shù)據(jù)還不充分?!币呙绾蛡魅静〗M織(Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization)的疫苗開發(fā)副主任特里娜·拉辛向《財富》雜志介紹加強針免疫持續(xù)時間背后的科學時表示。
拉辛說:“一些初步數(shù)據(jù)表明,隨著時間推移,人們對第三針免疫反應確實開始減弱,跟兩劑疫苗情況一樣,說明可能需要第四針?!?/p>
隨著更多關于第三針免疫數(shù)據(jù)的公布,安東尼·福奇等公共衛(wèi)生官員已經(jīng)開始吹風繼續(xù)接種的可能性,尤其是部分人群。
“完全可以想象,可能[需要第四針]?!苯衲?月福奇表示,“但我認為匆忙打第四針之前,應該仔細觀察第三針的效果?!?/p>
即便缺少數(shù)據(jù),一些科學家態(tài)度還是謹慎樂觀,至少目前如此。他們認為今后可能不需要每六個月打一次加強針疫苗。但每年一次可能有必要。
“希望更像是流感疫苗,每年必須注射一次?!崩琳f?!?個月太頻繁?!?/p>
“目前沒有哪種令人擔心的變異可以逃避原始免疫,哪怕比奧密克戎還厲害的變異毒株也不行,所以我認為不太可能需要6個月打一次加強針?!被堇锉硎就?。
針對弱勢群體的定向加強針
多數(shù)科學家急切等待更多數(shù)據(jù)的同時,一些國家已經(jīng)往前推進,推薦某些弱勢群體接種第四針加強針。
美國疾病控制與預防中心建議,免疫功能中度受損或重度低下的成年人應該注射第四針。歐洲的幾個國家仍然在討論如何向人們推薦第四針以及哪些人群需要,2月14日,瑞典開始向80歲及以上公民推薦接種第四針。
在更多的國家,對未來劑量制定方法可能很快變成常態(tài)。
“可以預料,尤其是老年人群的免疫力可能達不到年輕健康人群的水平,可能需要更快注射第四針?!崩琳f。
惠理也認為專門建議特定群體接種可能變得常見。他說:“老年人面臨兩個問題:第一,疫苗效果不好,第二,剛開始抗體反應不太明顯。我們希望盡可能長時間保持抗體水平?!?/p>
但重要的是記住,年輕人不一定不會轉(zhuǎn)為重癥。根據(jù)新冠病毒的傳播方式,年輕人和其他健康人群可能仍然需要注射加強針。
“主要取決于全球各地病毒傳播情況和新變種出現(xiàn)的可能性?!崩琳f。她認為,即便現(xiàn)在并非所有的成年人都需要注射更多加強針,并不排除將來需要加強針的可能性。
惠理同意,未來的公共衛(wèi)生措施將取決于病毒演變和傳播方式,并堅持認為,為保護老年人和免疫功能低下的群體,注射加強針可能仍然有必要。
“第三劑乃至第四劑真正的需要是保護老年人、免疫缺陷者和高危人群?!彼a充說,“加強針的目標當中包括限制社區(qū)傳播,保持企業(yè)和學校開放,逐步實現(xiàn)社會重新全面開放?!?
自由和選擇
有可能,甚至可能性很大的是,我們將進入疫情的新階段。在新階段里,各國政府認為有必要保持謹慎,敦促更多的人注射加強針。
“政府的作用是為人民提供生命、自由和追求幸福的機會?!眹H疫苗研究所(International Vaccine Institute)的所長杰羅姆·金告訴《財富》雜志?!罢畱摫Wo生命,理解自由,實施必要層級的保護?!?/p>
但目前尚不清楚多數(shù)人會不會聽從政府建議。
關于強制疫苗和病毒管控措施的抗議正在席卷加拿大、美國、法國和比利時等國。在新冠疫情早期,很多人還愿意調(diào)整自己的生活方式,但如今政府想讓公民配合卻變得越發(fā)困難。
全世界有越來越多的人開始嘗試與病毒共存,歐美國家紛紛取消對口罩令和病毒管控措施,更多的國家正在逐步放寬對游客的入境和隔離要求。
專家一致認為,加強針可能會推薦給某些人群,但單靠加強針并不能夠終結(jié)疫情。
“我們認為當前反應就像防御機制。”金說。“第一道防線是剛開始起作用的規(guī)定,比如戴口罩和保持社交距離。第二道防線是接種疫苗?!备鶕?jù)他的說法,如果病毒逐漸突破兩條防線慢慢擴散,軍火庫里最后的武器就是即便感染疾病也能夠降低重癥風險的治療藥物?!爸委熆梢苑乐谷藗冏≡?,也能夠避免死亡?!苯鹫f。
專家表示,加強針很重要,尤其是對某些人來說。但可以預防死亡和重癥的療法,例如單克隆抗體或輝瑞公司(Pfizer)最近獲批的藥物Paxlovid對終結(jié)疫情同樣重要。
“我更希望自己不生病,比生病時能選擇吃藥強。但我認為兩種方法都有必要。”拉辛說。
“疫苗有效果,正在發(fā)揮作用,”惠理說。“我們需要的是人們感染時的療法,這樣就可以進行早期干預,調(diào)整平衡并最終獲得好結(jié)果。”(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:夏林
有個好消息,也有個壞消息。好消息是新冠疫苗加強針確實有用,壞消息是效用可能逐漸減弱。
還要繼續(xù)打嗎?到底還要打多少次新冠疫苗?
2021年9月德爾塔變異毒株大舉侵襲期間,美國疾病控制與預防中心(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)曾經(jīng)宣布,只建議65歲以上或有基礎病的人群接種新冠疫苗。
6個月后,情況完全改變。2021年11月在南非首次發(fā)現(xiàn)的高傳染性奧密克戎變異毒株已經(jīng)在全世界迅速瘋狂傳播,歐美公共衛(wèi)生官員建議,所有成年人都應該接種加強針。
但只打加強針就夠了嗎?
美國疾病控制與預防中心的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,第三針可以有效防止奧密克戎病例住院,尤其是老年人。但是該中心的最近一項研究顯示,注射第三針加強針四個月后,免疫力可能會減弱。為了預防奧密克戎以及未來的變異毒株,會不會建議注射第四針,乃至第五針?
“新冠病毒造成了很多意料之外的狀況,每次我們對解決問題充滿信心。必要的話,我們得保持快速調(diào)整。”賓夕法尼亞大學免疫學研究所(Institute for Immunology at the University of Pennsylvania)的所長約翰·惠理告訴《財富》雜志。
在惠理看來,這意味著無論情況如何都要保留選擇,包括未來的加強針。
數(shù)據(jù)缺失
本次疫情和背后的新冠病毒讓所有科學家頭疼。很多情況我們還不了解。病毒起源何處?為什么一些人的癥狀比其他人重?為什么有這么多的無癥狀病例?當然還有,加強針能夠維持多久?
“可惜的是,目前數(shù)據(jù)還不充分?!币呙绾蛡魅静〗M織(Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization)的疫苗開發(fā)副主任特里娜·拉辛向《財富》雜志介紹加強針免疫持續(xù)時間背后的科學時表示。
拉辛說:“一些初步數(shù)據(jù)表明,隨著時間推移,人們對第三針免疫反應確實開始減弱,跟兩劑疫苗情況一樣,說明可能需要第四針?!?/p>
隨著更多關于第三針免疫數(shù)據(jù)的公布,安東尼·福奇等公共衛(wèi)生官員已經(jīng)開始吹風繼續(xù)接種的可能性,尤其是部分人群。
“完全可以想象,可能[需要第四針]?!苯衲?月福奇表示,“但我認為匆忙打第四針之前,應該仔細觀察第三針的效果?!?/p>
即便缺少數(shù)據(jù),一些科學家態(tài)度還是謹慎樂觀,至少目前如此。他們認為今后可能不需要每六個月打一次加強針疫苗。但每年一次可能有必要。
“希望更像是流感疫苗,每年必須注射一次?!崩琳f?!?個月太頻繁。”
“目前沒有哪種令人擔心的變異可以逃避原始免疫,哪怕比奧密克戎還厲害的變異毒株也不行,所以我認為不太可能需要6個月打一次加強針。”惠里表示同意。
針對弱勢群體的定向加強針
多數(shù)科學家急切等待更多數(shù)據(jù)的同時,一些國家已經(jīng)往前推進,推薦某些弱勢群體接種第四針加強針。
美國疾病控制與預防中心建議,免疫功能中度受損或重度低下的成年人應該注射第四針。歐洲的幾個國家仍然在討論如何向人們推薦第四針以及哪些人群需要,2月14日,瑞典開始向80歲及以上公民推薦接種第四針。
在更多的國家,對未來劑量制定方法可能很快變成常態(tài)。
“可以預料,尤其是老年人群的免疫力可能達不到年輕健康人群的水平,可能需要更快注射第四針?!崩琳f。
惠理也認為專門建議特定群體接種可能變得常見。他說:“老年人面臨兩個問題:第一,疫苗效果不好,第二,剛開始抗體反應不太明顯。我們希望盡可能長時間保持抗體水平?!?/p>
但重要的是記住,年輕人不一定不會轉(zhuǎn)為重癥。根據(jù)新冠病毒的傳播方式,年輕人和其他健康人群可能仍然需要注射加強針。
“主要取決于全球各地病毒傳播情況和新變種出現(xiàn)的可能性?!崩琳f。她認為,即便現(xiàn)在并非所有的成年人都需要注射更多加強針,并不排除將來需要加強針的可能性。
惠理同意,未來的公共衛(wèi)生措施將取決于病毒演變和傳播方式,并堅持認為,為保護老年人和免疫功能低下的群體,注射加強針可能仍然有必要。
“第三劑乃至第四劑真正的需要是保護老年人、免疫缺陷者和高危人群?!彼a充說,“加強針的目標當中包括限制社區(qū)傳播,保持企業(yè)和學校開放,逐步實現(xiàn)社會重新全面開放?!?
自由和選擇
有可能,甚至可能性很大的是,我們將進入疫情的新階段。在新階段里,各國政府認為有必要保持謹慎,敦促更多的人注射加強針。
“政府的作用是為人民提供生命、自由和追求幸福的機會?!眹H疫苗研究所(International Vaccine Institute)的所長杰羅姆·金告訴《財富》雜志?!罢畱摫Wo生命,理解自由,實施必要層級的保護。”
但目前尚不清楚多數(shù)人會不會聽從政府建議。
關于強制疫苗和病毒管控措施的抗議正在席卷加拿大、美國、法國和比利時等國。在新冠疫情早期,很多人還愿意調(diào)整自己的生活方式,但如今政府想讓公民配合卻變得越發(fā)困難。
全世界有越來越多的人開始嘗試與病毒共存,歐美國家紛紛取消對口罩令和病毒管控措施,更多的國家正在逐步放寬對游客的入境和隔離要求。
專家一致認為,加強針可能會推薦給某些人群,但單靠加強針并不能夠終結(jié)疫情。
“我們認為當前反應就像防御機制?!苯鹫f。“第一道防線是剛開始起作用的規(guī)定,比如戴口罩和保持社交距離。第二道防線是接種疫苗?!备鶕?jù)他的說法,如果病毒逐漸突破兩條防線慢慢擴散,軍火庫里最后的武器就是即便感染疾病也能夠降低重癥風險的治療藥物?!爸委熆梢苑乐谷藗冏≡海材軌虮苊馑劳??!苯鹫f。
專家表示,加強針很重要,尤其是對某些人來說。但可以預防死亡和重癥的療法,例如單克隆抗體或輝瑞公司(Pfizer)最近獲批的藥物Paxlovid對終結(jié)疫情同樣重要。
“我更希望自己不生病,比生病時能選擇吃藥強。但我認為兩種方法都有必要?!崩琳f。
“疫苗有效果,正在發(fā)揮作用,”惠理說。“我們需要的是人們感染時的療法,這樣就可以進行早期干預,調(diào)整平衡并最終獲得好結(jié)果?!保ㄘ敻恢形木W(wǎng))
譯者:夏林
It’s a good news and bad news situation. The boosters work, but they probably fade.
So do we need more? And how many more doses of COVID vaccines will we have to take?
Amid the Delta wave last September, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced it was recommending COVID vaccine booster shots only to people over 65 or with underlying medical conditions.
Fast forward six months, and the game has changed. The highly-contagious Omicron variant, first detected in South Africa last November, has spread fast and furious throughout the world, and public health officials in the U.S. and Europe have recommended booster shots for all adults.
But is this enough?
Data from the CDC shows that third shots can be as much as 90% effective at preventing hospitalization from Omicron, especially in older adults. But immunity granted from boosters may wane as early as four months after taking the third shot, according to a recent CDC study. To guard against this and future variants, should we be expecting recommendations to take fourth, or even fifth doses?
“We've been surprised by this virus multiple times and we've been overconfident about having solved things multiple times. We need to remain in a position to pivot rapidly if we need to,” Dr. John Wherry, director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Pennsylvania, told Fortune.
For Dr. Wherry, that means keeping options on the table, including future boosters, for whatever circumstances arise.
Missing data
The pandemic and the SARS-CoV-2 virus that fueled it has left pretty much every scientist scratching their heads. There are so many things we still do not know. Where did the virus emerge from? Why does it make some people so much sicker than others? Why are so many cases asymptomatic? And of course, how long do the boosters last?
“Unfortunately, the data is not quite there yet,” Dr. Trina Racine, associate director for vaccine development at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization, told Fortune about the science behind the length of booster immunity.
“There is some preliminary data that would suggest our immune responses to third doses do start to wane over time, just like we saw with two,” Dr. Racine said. “That would suggest fourth doses may be necessary.”
Public health officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, have begun to tout the possibility of further doses, at least for some segments of the population, should more data on the immunity of third doses come in.
"It's entirely conceivable that we might [need fourth doses],” Fauci said in January. “But I think before we rush to a fourth dose, I would be careful to see what the result of the third dose is."
Even with missing data, some scientists are cautiously optimistic, at least for now, that we will avoid a scenario in which a new vaccine booster is required every six months to maintain a defense against the virus. But it might still be annual.
“Hopefully it’ll be more like a flu shot where you have to get it once a year,” Dr. Racine said. “Six months is pretty frequent.”
“In the absence of a real concerning new variant that escapes preexisting immunity, much worse than even Omicron, I think boosters every six months would be unlikely,” Dr. Wherry agreed.
Targeted boosters for vulnerable groups
Even though most scientists eagerly await more data to come in, some countries are moving forward with recommending a fourth vaccine booster shot for specific groups of vulnerable people.
In the U.S., the CDC has recommended that all adults who are moderately or severely immunocompromised receive a fourth dose. In Europe, several countries are still discussing how to recommend fourth doses and to which groups of people, while Sweden began recommending fourth doses to all citizens 80 and over on February 14.
Targeted approaches to future doses may become the norm soon in more countries.
“I could see, especially in older populations where immunity maybe didn't reach the same high levels as in younger, healthier populations, fourth doses may be required sooner,” Dr. Racine said.
Dr. Wherry agreed that targeted recommendations for certain groups could become commonplace. “Elderly people have two issues,” he said. “One, vaccines don't work as well, and two: you don't get as high of an antibody response initially. We want to try to keep those antibody levels up for as long as we can.”
But it’s important to keep in mind that youth does not necessarily translate to less severe forms of the disease, and depending on how COVID is circulating, booster shots may still be necessary for younger and otherwise healthy people.
“It's going to depend on circulating levels around the world and the likelihood of new variants coming out,” Dr. Racine said. She believes that even if more boosters are not required for all adults now, that does not exclude the possibility that they will be in the future.
Dr. Wherry agreed that any future public health measures will depend on how the virus evolves and how it is circulating, maintaining that booster shots may continue to be necessary in order to protect older and immunocompromised groups.
“The real need for a third dose or even a fourth dose is to protect the elderly, people who are immunocompromised and at high risk,” he said, adding that “part of what we want to try to achieve with boosters is to limit community spread, to help keep our businesses and schools open and start to move towards a general reopening of society.”
Liberties and alternatives
It’s possible, even likely, that we will reach a different stage of the pandemic in which governments feel the need to exercise caution and urge more people to get boosted.
“The role of the government is to provide life, liberty and pursuit of happiness to its people,” Dr. Jerome Kim, director general of the International Vaccine Institute, told Fortune. “Its role is to preserve life, understand the liberties and put into place the level of protection that is needed.”
But it remains unclear whether a majority of the population will follow through on those pleas.
Protests against vaccine mandates and anti-COVID restrictions are sweeping Canada, the U.S, France, and Belgium. While many people were willing to adjust their lifestyles earlier in the pandemic, it is becoming increasingly difficult for governments to ask their citizens to do so.
Countries have already started to roll back masking and COVID restrictions in the U.S. and Europe, while many more are loosening their entry and quarantine requirements for new arrivals, as a growing portion of the world begins trying to live with the virus.
Experts agree that boosters may become recommended to certain segments of the population, but boosters alone are not what will end the pandemic.
“We think of our response like a defense,” Dr. Kim said. “The first line of defense were the things that worked in the beginning like mask wearing and distancing. The second line of defense is to vaccinate.” If cases trickle past both of these defense lines, then the final weapon in our arsenal, according to Dr. Kim, are therapeutic medicines that can reduce the risk of getting seriously sick, even if one contracts the disease. “[Therapeutics can] keep people out of the hospital, keep them from dying,” Dr. Kim said.
Boosters are important, especially for some people, but therapeutics that can prevent deaths and instances of severe disease, such as monoclonal antibodies or Pfizer’s recently approved Paxlovid drug, are just as important to ending the pandemic, experts say.
“I would rather prevent myself from getting sick, versus having the option of taking a pill if I do. But I think both are necessary,” Dr. Racine said.
“The vaccines are working, they're doing their job,” Dr. Wherry said. “What we need are therapeutics for when people do get infected so that we can intervene early and shift the balance and outcome.”