印孚瑟斯公司(Infosys)的總裁拉維·庫馬爾去年一直在盡其所能呼吁全世界關(guān)注疫苗。
去年12月,他給我發(fā)了一封頗有先見之明的電子郵件?!捌髽I(yè)可以發(fā)揮關(guān)鍵作用,在工作場所傳播疫苗知識、建立人們對疫苗接種的信任?!彼卩]件中寫道,“如今,建立和維系對疫苗的信心前所未有地重要。”
五個月后的今天,庫馬爾正在全力抗擊新冠疫情,他的想法和言辭也依然沒有改變。印孚瑟斯共有25萬名員工,其中大部分都在印度工作,而印度的新冠感染率正在不斷飆升。本周新聞頭版頭條刊出的印度感染數(shù)據(jù)創(chuàng)下歷史新高,單日新增病例高達40萬例。疫苗、氧氣和醫(yī)院床位都很匱乏,人們越來越絕望。這是一場可怕的災(zāi)難。
正如庫馬爾一直以來所警告的,這場災(zāi)難影響的遠不止有印度。作為全球經(jīng)濟和印度崛起的象征,印孚瑟斯的業(yè)務(wù)遍布46個國家,該公司承諾未來兩年將在美國雇傭數(shù)萬名工人。庫馬爾本人則常駐紐約,這一點與公司以往的高管有所不同。
我們可能無法再“回到”曾經(jīng)生活的那個世界。印孚瑟斯等企業(yè)警告稱,現(xiàn)如今各國在專利、護照等問題上爭論不休,全球難以齊心協(xié)力應(yīng)對新冠疫情,這會對我們已緊密相連的勞動力和經(jīng)濟構(gòu)成巨大的威脅。庫馬爾抗擊新冠疫情、保護員工和企業(yè)的做法,值得其他依賴全球化的個人和企業(yè)(也就是我們大多數(shù)人)效仿。以下是我們能夠借鑒的一些經(jīng)驗教訓(xùn):
在我們所有人都安全之前,沒有人是安全的
印度、巴西和其他國家抗擊新冠疫情的影像令人揪心。庫馬爾提醒我們,不要盲目樂觀?!按蠹乙欢ㄒ靼?,面對這場疫情,在我們所有人都安全之前,沒有人是安全的?!彼f,“私營企業(yè)的作用是確保全球經(jīng)濟繼續(xù)向前發(fā)展,我們這些大型全球企業(yè)可以與我們的員工跨境合作,建立信心,減輕公眾對疫苗的疑慮?!?/p>
過去幾年,我們依然互相依存:我們幾乎不可能一整天都不消費任何一種牽涉其他國家勞動力的商品或服務(wù)。
而雇主也能夠幫忙傳播相關(guān)信息。庫馬爾稱:“企業(yè)具有獨一無二的力量,可以起到勸說和消除疑慮的作用,能夠透明清晰地說明情況,遏制與新冠疫苗相關(guān)的不信任和恐懼蔓延。”
在缺乏統(tǒng)一準(zhǔn)則、協(xié)作或共識的情況下,企業(yè)必須進一步發(fā)揮力量
印孚瑟斯要求出差員工“不管政府如何規(guī)定”,都要進行自我隔離,到達目的地后至少一周內(nèi)不得前往印孚瑟斯或客戶的辦公室。
無論度假出游還是商務(wù)出差的旅行者,都曾經(jīng)對各地新冠檢測和隔離規(guī)定指導(dǎo)意見相互沖突、混亂不堪的情況表示失望。庫馬爾表示,在全球缺乏統(tǒng)一協(xié)作的情況下,“政府關(guān)注自己國家的國民,這些國民大多位于國境以內(nèi);而企業(yè)關(guān)注他們的員工,無論他們身在何方?!?/p>
TNMT的一項研究監(jiān)測了旅行和出行趨勢,認(rèn)為未來員工在做出有關(guān)旅行的決策時將會依賴這一指導(dǎo)意見:“公司需要進一步強調(diào)保護員工的道德和法律義務(wù)?!?/p>
這項調(diào)查還指出,技術(shù)無法取代商務(wù)差旅,這更加凸顯了抗擊新冠疫情對全球經(jīng)濟的緊迫性和必要性。旅行網(wǎng)站Skift的高級研究分析師沃特·海爾茨說:“(訪問客戶)不僅僅是為了和客戶在一個房間里面對面交談,更是為了展現(xiàn)承諾。如果你正在談一份價值幾百萬美元的合同,你提出和客戶進行Zoom電話會議,而你的競爭對手卻飛去親自見了這位潛在客戶,你認(rèn)為誰看起來更有誠意?”
給感染新冠病毒的員工放個病假
印孚瑟斯會為感染新冠病毒或正在康復(fù)的員工提供額外的21天帶薪假期。相比之下,通常美國企業(yè)只為員工提供6天至10天的假期,公共部門機構(gòu)則提供兩周假期。
也要關(guān)心員工的家人
上周,印度新聞報刊報道,印孚瑟斯在印度浦那和班加羅爾的辦公室設(shè)立了新冠護理中心,并且還在籌建更多新冠護理中心。此外,一些印孚瑟斯的園區(qū)也設(shè)立了疫苗接種中心。值得注意的是,這些設(shè)施不僅為員工提供服務(wù),也為員工的家人提供服務(wù)。這種關(guān)心員工全家的做法(不少印度雇主會建造完整的住宅區(qū)、醫(yī)院和學(xué)校)意義重大,因為它解決了新冠疫情的一大共同傳播源:家庭和家人。
而且,印孚瑟斯借助這些設(shè)施,把疫苗帶到了人們熟悉的地方,也就是工作場所,從而減輕了疫苗的推廣分發(fā)工作——在世界上的許多地方,疫苗的推廣分發(fā)工作一直都很復(fù)雜混亂。
免費提供疫苗
從去年12月、今年3月再到現(xiàn)在,庫馬爾一再指出,印孚瑟斯將負(fù)擔(dān)員工的疫苗費用。他表示,這不僅僅是錢的問題:“這對我們來說很重要。我們不僅想減輕員工的負(fù)擔(dān),而且我們認(rèn)為,企業(yè)可以在推動全球接種疫苗方面發(fā)揮重要作用?!?/p>
律師事務(wù)所Ogletree Deakins的勞動律師邦妮·帕克特表示,因勢施計很關(guān)鍵,因為全球各地的員工在新冠疫情一事上面對的實際情況各不相同:有些國家還處于封鎖之中,有些國家已經(jīng)敞開了國門,有些國家則介于兩者之間。她說:“很多地方疫苗的供應(yīng)量有限,搶先強制要求員工接種疫苗或詢問員工疫苗接種情況的行為可能是不合時宜的?!迸量颂剡€補充道,她看到有些企業(yè)會盡可能地幫助員工接種疫苗?!斑@些企業(yè)正在努力確保在疫苗供應(yīng)量有限的地方,他們的員工能夠獲得疫苗?!彼f,“有些企業(yè)則在研究跨境接種疫苗的可能性?!?/p>
咨詢公司Gartner的一項關(guān)于人力資源的調(diào)查顯示,近一半受訪組織表示,他們不會跟蹤記錄員工接種疫苗的情況。但是,免費疫苗、現(xiàn)場接種疫苗和其他補貼有助于強調(diào)公司在這一問題上的立場。運動營養(yǎng)和健康食品公司Clif Bar & Co.在上周宣布,接種疫苗的員工可以獲得150美元的獎金。如果員工選擇捐出這筆獎金,公司會把這筆錢交給致力解決農(nóng)場工人健康不平等問題的Migrant Clinicians Network組織?!把巯?,疫苗獲取公平性問題對企業(yè)來說是一個極為重要的問題?!盋lif Bar的首席執(zhí)行官莎莉·格蘭姆斯稱:“我們國家有太多員工依然很難接種疫苗,尤其是一線工作人員?!?/p>
全球每一家企業(yè)都必須認(rèn)識到新冠疫情帶來的創(chuàng)傷
和許多提供高福利的企業(yè)一樣,印孚瑟斯在過去一年推出了一系列與心理健康、自我護理、女性健康和工作/生活平衡相關(guān)的舉措。
這一點十分重要,因為印度、巴西、秘魯、尼泊爾和瑞典等國家的病例還在增加。你所在的城市或國家逐漸取消封鎖,并不意味著視頻會議上所有與會人員(或他們的家人)都已經(jīng)脫離了危險。各地從新冠疫情中恢復(fù)的情況可能是不平衡甚至不公平的,雇主需要繼續(xù)明確一點:全球勞動力是脆弱的,但同時又是緊密相連的。
強有力的新冠疫情應(yīng)對措施可能有利于企業(yè)
一份商業(yè)報紙在報道印孚瑟斯新設(shè)立的新冠護理中心時肯定地指出:“這家公司86%的收入來自美國和歐洲等市場,該公司表示,目前的健康狀況不會影響其向客戶交付產(chǎn)品和服務(wù)?!?/p>
私營企業(yè)目前面臨著很大的風(fēng)險。我們可以承認(rèn),要想動員有效的新冠疫情應(yīng)對措施,我們既要關(guān)心員工,也要關(guān)心企業(yè)。
我們每天看到的新聞頭條都和印度有關(guān),不止死亡人數(shù)和病例統(tǒng)計,還有更多其他新聞,例如《印度新冠危機可能導(dǎo)致全球經(jīng)濟脫軌的四大原因》和《印度新冠危機威脅全球石油產(chǎn)業(yè)復(fù)蘇》。
我問喬治城大學(xué)(Georgetown University)的法律教授馬達維·桑德,跨國企業(yè)能夠做些什么,幫助世界發(fā)生進一步危機。她說有兩點:第一,向旨在彌合發(fā)展中國家疫苗缺口的新冠肺炎疫苗實施計劃(Covax)捐款;第二,她說:“跨國企業(yè)可以幫忙資助發(fā)展中國家的疫苗制造商,幫助其改造新冠疫苗生產(chǎn)工廠。我們需要通過投資幫助泰國、巴西、南非、孟加拉國和其他發(fā)展中國家現(xiàn)有的制造商?!?/p>
正如我們在此次疫情中看到的,發(fā)生在一個國家的災(zāi)難不會只在這一個國家肆虐。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:錢功毅
印孚瑟斯公司(Infosys)的總裁拉維·庫馬爾去年一直在盡其所能呼吁全世界關(guān)注疫苗。
去年12月,他給我發(fā)了一封頗有先見之明的電子郵件?!捌髽I(yè)可以發(fā)揮關(guān)鍵作用,在工作場所傳播疫苗知識、建立人們對疫苗接種的信任?!彼卩]件中寫道,“如今,建立和維系對疫苗的信心前所未有地重要。”
五個月后的今天,庫馬爾正在全力抗擊新冠疫情,他的想法和言辭也依然沒有改變。印孚瑟斯共有25萬名員工,其中大部分都在印度工作,而印度的新冠感染率正在不斷飆升。本周新聞頭版頭條刊出的印度感染數(shù)據(jù)創(chuàng)下歷史新高,單日新增病例高達40萬例。疫苗、氧氣和醫(yī)院床位都很匱乏,人們越來越絕望。這是一場可怕的災(zāi)難。
正如庫馬爾一直以來所警告的,這場災(zāi)難影響的遠不止有印度。作為全球經(jīng)濟和印度崛起的象征,印孚瑟斯的業(yè)務(wù)遍布46個國家,該公司承諾未來兩年將在美國雇傭數(shù)萬名工人。庫馬爾本人則常駐紐約,這一點與公司以往的高管有所不同。
我們可能無法再“回到”曾經(jīng)生活的那個世界。印孚瑟斯等企業(yè)警告稱,現(xiàn)如今各國在專利、護照等問題上爭論不休,全球難以齊心協(xié)力應(yīng)對新冠疫情,這會對我們已緊密相連的勞動力和經(jīng)濟構(gòu)成巨大的威脅。庫馬爾抗擊新冠疫情、保護員工和企業(yè)的做法,值得其他依賴全球化的個人和企業(yè)(也就是我們大多數(shù)人)效仿。以下是我們能夠借鑒的一些經(jīng)驗教訓(xùn):
在我們所有人都安全之前,沒有人是安全的
印度、巴西和其他國家抗擊新冠疫情的影像令人揪心。庫馬爾提醒我們,不要盲目樂觀?!按蠹乙欢ㄒ靼?,面對這場疫情,在我們所有人都安全之前,沒有人是安全的?!彼f,“私營企業(yè)的作用是確保全球經(jīng)濟繼續(xù)向前發(fā)展,我們這些大型全球企業(yè)可以與我們的員工跨境合作,建立信心,減輕公眾對疫苗的疑慮?!?/p>
過去幾年,我們依然互相依存:我們幾乎不可能一整天都不消費任何一種牽涉其他國家勞動力的商品或服務(wù)。
而雇主也能夠幫忙傳播相關(guān)信息。庫馬爾稱:“企業(yè)具有獨一無二的力量,可以起到勸說和消除疑慮的作用,能夠透明清晰地說明情況,遏制與新冠疫苗相關(guān)的不信任和恐懼蔓延?!?/p>
在缺乏統(tǒng)一準(zhǔn)則、協(xié)作或共識的情況下,企業(yè)必須進一步發(fā)揮力量
印孚瑟斯要求出差員工“不管政府如何規(guī)定”,都要進行自我隔離,到達目的地后至少一周內(nèi)不得前往印孚瑟斯或客戶的辦公室。
無論度假出游還是商務(wù)出差的旅行者,都曾經(jīng)對各地新冠檢測和隔離規(guī)定指導(dǎo)意見相互沖突、混亂不堪的情況表示失望。庫馬爾表示,在全球缺乏統(tǒng)一協(xié)作的情況下,“政府關(guān)注自己國家的國民,這些國民大多位于國境以內(nèi);而企業(yè)關(guān)注他們的員工,無論他們身在何方?!?/p>
TNMT的一項研究監(jiān)測了旅行和出行趨勢,認(rèn)為未來員工在做出有關(guān)旅行的決策時將會依賴這一指導(dǎo)意見:“公司需要進一步強調(diào)保護員工的道德和法律義務(wù)。”
這項調(diào)查還指出,技術(shù)無法取代商務(wù)差旅,這更加凸顯了抗擊新冠疫情對全球經(jīng)濟的緊迫性和必要性。旅行網(wǎng)站Skift的高級研究分析師沃特·海爾茨說:“(訪問客戶)不僅僅是為了和客戶在一個房間里面對面交談,更是為了展現(xiàn)承諾。如果你正在談一份價值幾百萬美元的合同,你提出和客戶進行Zoom電話會議,而你的競爭對手卻飛去親自見了這位潛在客戶,你認(rèn)為誰看起來更有誠意?”
給感染新冠病毒的員工放個病假
印孚瑟斯會為感染新冠病毒或正在康復(fù)的員工提供額外的21天帶薪假期。相比之下,通常美國企業(yè)只為員工提供6天至10天的假期,公共部門機構(gòu)則提供兩周假期。
也要關(guān)心員工的家人
上周,印度新聞報刊報道,印孚瑟斯在印度浦那和班加羅爾的辦公室設(shè)立了新冠護理中心,并且還在籌建更多新冠護理中心。此外,一些印孚瑟斯的園區(qū)也設(shè)立了疫苗接種中心。值得注意的是,這些設(shè)施不僅為員工提供服務(wù),也為員工的家人提供服務(wù)。這種關(guān)心員工全家的做法(不少印度雇主會建造完整的住宅區(qū)、醫(yī)院和學(xué)校)意義重大,因為它解決了新冠疫情的一大共同傳播源:家庭和家人。
而且,印孚瑟斯借助這些設(shè)施,把疫苗帶到了人們熟悉的地方,也就是工作場所,從而減輕了疫苗的推廣分發(fā)工作——在世界上的許多地方,疫苗的推廣分發(fā)工作一直都很復(fù)雜混亂。
免費提供疫苗
從去年12月、今年3月再到現(xiàn)在,庫馬爾一再指出,印孚瑟斯將負(fù)擔(dān)員工的疫苗費用。他表示,這不僅僅是錢的問題:“這對我們來說很重要。我們不僅想減輕員工的負(fù)擔(dān),而且我們認(rèn)為,企業(yè)可以在推動全球接種疫苗方面發(fā)揮重要作用。”
律師事務(wù)所Ogletree Deakins的勞動律師邦妮·帕克特表示,因勢施計很關(guān)鍵,因為全球各地的員工在新冠疫情一事上面對的實際情況各不相同:有些國家還處于封鎖之中,有些國家已經(jīng)敞開了國門,有些國家則介于兩者之間。她說:“很多地方疫苗的供應(yīng)量有限,搶先強制要求員工接種疫苗或詢問員工疫苗接種情況的行為可能是不合時宜的?!迸量颂剡€補充道,她看到有些企業(yè)會盡可能地幫助員工接種疫苗。“這些企業(yè)正在努力確保在疫苗供應(yīng)量有限的地方,他們的員工能夠獲得疫苗?!彼f,“有些企業(yè)則在研究跨境接種疫苗的可能性?!?/p>
咨詢公司Gartner的一項關(guān)于人力資源的調(diào)查顯示,近一半受訪組織表示,他們不會跟蹤記錄員工接種疫苗的情況。但是,免費疫苗、現(xiàn)場接種疫苗和其他補貼有助于強調(diào)公司在這一問題上的立場。運動營養(yǎng)和健康食品公司Clif Bar & Co.在上周宣布,接種疫苗的員工可以獲得150美元的獎金。如果員工選擇捐出這筆獎金,公司會把這筆錢交給致力解決農(nóng)場工人健康不平等問題的Migrant Clinicians Network組織?!把巯拢呙绔@取公平性問題對企業(yè)來說是一個極為重要的問題?!盋lif Bar的首席執(zhí)行官莎莉·格蘭姆斯稱:“我們國家有太多員工依然很難接種疫苗,尤其是一線工作人員?!?/p>
全球每一家企業(yè)都必須認(rèn)識到新冠疫情帶來的創(chuàng)傷
和許多提供高福利的企業(yè)一樣,印孚瑟斯在過去一年推出了一系列與心理健康、自我護理、女性健康和工作/生活平衡相關(guān)的舉措。
這一點十分重要,因為印度、巴西、秘魯、尼泊爾和瑞典等國家的病例還在增加。你所在的城市或國家逐漸取消封鎖,并不意味著視頻會議上所有與會人員(或他們的家人)都已經(jīng)脫離了危險。各地從新冠疫情中恢復(fù)的情況可能是不平衡甚至不公平的,雇主需要繼續(xù)明確一點:全球勞動力是脆弱的,但同時又是緊密相連的。
強有力的新冠疫情應(yīng)對措施可能有利于企業(yè)
一份商業(yè)報紙在報道印孚瑟斯新設(shè)立的新冠護理中心時肯定地指出:“這家公司86%的收入來自美國和歐洲等市場,該公司表示,目前的健康狀況不會影響其向客戶交付產(chǎn)品和服務(wù)?!?/p>
私營企業(yè)目前面臨著很大的風(fēng)險。我們可以承認(rèn),要想動員有效的新冠疫情應(yīng)對措施,我們既要關(guān)心員工,也要關(guān)心企業(yè)。
我們每天看到的新聞頭條都和印度有關(guān),不止死亡人數(shù)和病例統(tǒng)計,還有更多其他新聞,例如《印度新冠危機可能導(dǎo)致全球經(jīng)濟脫軌的四大原因》和《印度新冠危機威脅全球石油產(chǎn)業(yè)復(fù)蘇》。
我問喬治城大學(xué)(Georgetown University)的法律教授馬達維·桑德,跨國企業(yè)能夠做些什么,幫助世界發(fā)生進一步危機。她說有兩點:第一,向旨在彌合發(fā)展中國家疫苗缺口的新冠肺炎疫苗實施計劃(Covax)捐款;第二,她說:“跨國企業(yè)可以幫忙資助發(fā)展中國家的疫苗制造商,幫助其改造新冠疫苗生產(chǎn)工廠。我們需要通過投資幫助泰國、巴西、南非、孟加拉國和其他發(fā)展中國家現(xiàn)有的制造商?!?/p>
正如我們在此次疫情中看到的,發(fā)生在一個國家的災(zāi)難不會只在這一個國家肆虐。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:錢功毅
Infosys president Ravi Kumar was trying to get global attention on vaccines last year.
“Businesses can play a pivotal role in encouraging vaccine literacy and engendering vaccination trust in the workplace,” he said in a prescient December email to me. “Building and sustaining vaccine confidence has never been more important.”
Five months later, Kumar is in the middle of an all-out war against COVID-19, but his tact and rhetoric remain the same. The bulk of Infosys’s 250,000 employees work in India, where rates of the virus are surging. Headlines report record-high numbers; 400,000 cases a day this week, and growing despair over a lack of vaccines, oxygen, and hospital beds. It’s dire.
The implications of this calamity extend far beyond India, which is what Kumar has been sounding alarms on all along. Infosys, an emblem of the global economy and India’s rise within, operates in 46 countries; Kumar is based in New York, a departure from top executives past, and Infosys has committed to hiring tens of thousands of workers in the U.S. in the next two years.
There might be no “going back” to the world we once were. Still, companies like Infosys warn the current lack of global coordination, evident in fights over patents to passports, poses a great threat to the connected workforce and economy we have become. Kumar’s approach to fighting COVID, protecting workers and business, warrants emulation by others dependent on globalization (i.e., most of us). Some lessons:
Nobody’s safe until we all are
It’s jarring to see the images from India, Brazil, and other countries fighting COVID outbreaks, as the U.S. celebrates a surplus of vaccines and circulates memos on reopening offices. Kumar reminds us not to be complacent: “It’s important to understand that with this pandemic, no one is safe unless everyone is safe,” he said. “The private sector’s role is to make sure the global economy continues to move forward, and [that] large, global employers like us can engage with our people across borders to build trust and ease public hesitancy toward vaccines.”
While the past few years, our interdependence remains: It is literally impossible to go a day without consuming a good or service that doesn’t involve the labor of people from countries other than our own.
Employers play a role in spreading that message, too. Said Kumar: “Businesses are uniquely equipped to chime in with reason and reassurance and to bring the transparency and clarity that is needed to counter the spread of distrust and fear associated with COVID-19 vaccinations.”
In the absence of rules or coordination or common sense, companies must step up
Infosys employees who travel for work have been asked to self-quarantine “irrespective of government regulations” and avoid visiting Infosys or client offices for a minimum of one week upon their arrival.
Travelers, leisure and business alike, have voiced frustration over conflicting, confusing guidance on COVID tests and quarantine restrictions. In the absence of coordination, Kumar explains, “governments are focused on their citizens, those who are largely located within a geographic border; businesses focus on their employees—no matter where they are.”
One study by TNMT, which monitors trends in travel and mobility, concludes workers will come to rely on this guidance when making decisions about travel: “Companies will need to put additional emphasis on their moral and legal obligation to protect employees.”
The same survey also said technology cannot replace business travel, which makes the urgency of fighting COVID even more imperative for a global economy. “It’s not just about being in the same room, it’s also about showing commitment. What if you are working on a multimillion-dollar contract, and propose a Zoom call, while your competitors fly out to see the potential client in person. Who do you think looks more committed?” said Wouter Geerts, a senior research analyst at Skift, a travel site.
Give employees with COVID time off
Infosys provides 21 days of additional paid leave for employees who have contracted or are recovering from COVID. Contrast that with the six to 10 days seemingly more common in U.S. workplaces, or the two weeks secured by public sector employers.
Take care of employees’ families, too
Last week, Indian newspapers reported Infosys had set up COVID care centers in offices in Pune and Bangalore, and more were on the way; some campuses also have set up vaccination centers. Notably, they are not just for workers but their families too. This holistic approach—it’s not uncommon to see entire housing colonies, hospitals, and schools built by Indian employers—is significant because it addresses a common source of COVID transmission: households and families.
It also eases vaccine distribution (a rollout which has been complicated and outright bungled in many parts of the world) by taking it to a place people are already familiar with: work.
Make vaccines free and accessible
The message over and over from Kumar, back in December, then in March and now, has been that Infosys will cover the cost of vaccines for employees. It’s about more than the money, he noted: “This is important to us because not only do we want to reduce this burden on our employees, but also because we believe that businesses have a big role to play in vaccinating the world.”
Customizing is key, said Bonnie Puckett, an employment lawyer with Ogletree Deakins, because workers around the world have different realities when it comes to COVID: Some countries are still in lockdown; others are wide open; many are in between. “The vaccine supply is quite limited in many places, and preemptive communication about mandating the vaccine or asking employees about vaccination status can come across as tone deaf,” she said. Puckett added that she is seeing companies help their workers get the vaccine whenever possible. They are trying to “secure vaccine supply for employees in the limited number of locations where this is a possibility,” she said. “And some are researching the extent to which cross-border ‘vaccine tourism’ is possible.”
Almost half of organizations in a Gartner HR survey say they won’t track employees’ vaccination status. But free vaccines, on-site vaccines, and other perks help underscore where a company stands on the issue. Clif Bar & Co. announced last week that employees will receive a $150 incentive if they get vaccinated. If they donate that amount, the company will apply the money to the Migrant Clinicians Network, which addresses farmworkers’ health inequities. “Equitable access to vaccines is an issue of paramount importance to businesses right now,” said Clif Bar CEO Sally Grimes. “Too many of our nation’s workers, especially frontline employees, still face significant hurdles to getting vaccinated.”
Every workplace in the world must acknowledge trauma
Like many companies offering enhanced benefits, Infosys has rolled out a series of initiatives over the past year related to mental health, self-care, women’s health, and work/life balance.
That’s important as countries such as India, Brazil, Peru, Nepal, and Sweden see a rise in cases. Just because your city or country is opening up does not mean the person on videoconference (or their family) is out of the woods yet. The post-COVID recovery will be an uneven, likely inequitable one, and employers need to continue to treat a global workforce as fragile—and connected.
A strong COVID response can be good for business
A business newspaper reporting on Infosys’s new COVID centers was sure to point out: “The company, which gets 86% of its revenues from markets like the U.S. and Europe, said it sees no impact on its client deliverables due to the current health situation.”
The private sector has much at stake right now, and it’s okay to admit that mobilizing effective COVID responses is as much about taking care of employees as about taking care of business.
Besides death tolls and case counts, the other daily headlines we are seeing related to India: “Four reasons why India’s COVID-19 crisis may derail the global economy” and “India’s COVID-19 crisis threatens a global oil recovery,” for example.
I asked Madhavi Sunder, a Georgetown law professor, what multinational companies (MNCs) can do to help stave off further crisis. She had two ideas. One, donate to Covax, the initiative to bridge the vaccine divide in developing countries. And two, she said, “MNCs can help pay for vaccine manufacturers in the developing world to retrofit their factories for COVID-19 vaccine production. We need to invest to help ready manufacturers in Thailand, Brazil, South Africa, Bangladesh, and other developing countries.”
As we have seen through the pandemic, what happens in one country does not stay in one country.