成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

立即打開(kāi)
蘋(píng)果該考慮收購(gòu)了,這些公司都是選項(xiàng)

蘋(píng)果該考慮收購(gòu)了,這些公司都是選項(xiàng)

Michael Wade 2017-03-31
為了保住顛覆者的位置,蘋(píng)果必須由防御性戰(zhàn)略轉(zhuǎn)向進(jìn)攻性戰(zhàn)略,大手筆收購(gòu)勢(shì)在必行。

本周二,蘋(píng)果股價(jià)已經(jīng)是三月份第五次刷新紀(jì)錄了,這也是蘋(píng)果股價(jià)今年第11次刷新紀(jì)錄?,F(xiàn)在我們應(yīng)該仔細(xì)觀察一下蘋(píng)果下一步將做些什么。蘋(píng)果一向是一個(gè)出色的顛覆者,且歷來(lái)堅(jiān)持“自造不外購(gòu)”。然而由于蘋(píng)果上周推出的新款iPad反響平平,很多人不禁質(zhì)疑,蘋(píng)果是否還是那個(gè)犀利的創(chuàng)新企業(yè)。

我之前曾經(jīng)說(shuō)過(guò),蘋(píng)果正在執(zhí)行一種“收割戰(zhàn)略”,以在趨平甚至下滑的市場(chǎng)上榨取盡可能多的利潤(rùn),這也是一個(gè)非常聰明的戰(zhàn)略。由于平板電腦市場(chǎng)整體不景氣,iPad也無(wú)法獨(dú)善其身。蘋(píng)果試圖在還有些賺頭的情況下盡可能地收割利潤(rùn)。這種戰(zhàn)略是說(shuō)得過(guò)去的,市場(chǎng)的反應(yīng)也證明了這一點(diǎn)——蘋(píng)果股價(jià)昨天再創(chuàng)歷史新高。

Mac、iPad和iPhone作為蘋(píng)果的三大支柱產(chǎn)品,其銷售額占蘋(píng)果總收益的比重超過(guò)了85%,然而這三種產(chǎn)品也都面臨著越來(lái)越大的壓力。未來(lái)對(duì)蘋(píng)果只會(huì)越來(lái)越難,而不是越來(lái)越簡(jiǎn)單。消費(fèi)者已經(jīng)不愿升級(jí)到實(shí)際改動(dòng)并不大的所謂“新款”,三星、中興和華為等競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手與蘋(píng)果的差距也變得越來(lái)越小,有時(shí)甚至能以更低的價(jià)格推出更高級(jí)的功能。另外,平臺(tái)之戰(zhàn)的天平已經(jīng)開(kāi)始朝著Android傾斜。雖然蘋(píng)果在這些產(chǎn)品上還有不小的“收割”空間,但蘋(píng)果的長(zhǎng)期展望卻著實(shí)不容樂(lè)觀。

為了保住顛覆者的位置,蘋(píng)果必須由防御性戰(zhàn)略轉(zhuǎn)向進(jìn)攻性戰(zhàn)略。好在蘋(píng)果的轉(zhuǎn)型資本還是很雄厚的,一有優(yōu)質(zhì)的品牌聲譽(yù),二有忠誠(chéng)的用戶群,三有多達(dá)2000億美元左右的現(xiàn)金可用。然而資本雄厚的廠商并非只有蘋(píng)果一家,就在其他競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手大搞收購(gòu)的同時(shí),蘋(píng)果卻基本上對(duì)收購(gòu)持觀望態(tài)度。它迄今為止最大手筆的一次收購(gòu),就是在2014年以30億美元收購(gòu)了Beats公司。與其他很多競(jìng)爭(zhēng)廠商相比,這樣的手筆只是小巫見(jiàn)大巫。

蘋(píng)果最近開(kāi)拓新業(yè)務(wù)領(lǐng)域的嘗試也并非很成功。首先,Apple Watch稱不上是一款革命性的產(chǎn)品。其次,蘋(píng)果的汽車(chē)戰(zhàn)略目前似乎陷入停滯。另外,蘋(píng)果音樂(lè)也仍未追上與Spotify的差距。正如新書(shū)《數(shù)字漩渦》(Digital Vortex)中所指出的那樣,蘋(píng)果需要更加擅于占領(lǐng)新的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)領(lǐng)域,不管它是不是那個(gè)領(lǐng)域的顛覆者。

重新構(gòu)建某種商品或服務(wù)是需要耗費(fèi)大量時(shí)間的。蘋(píng)果近來(lái)在核心產(chǎn)品之外的領(lǐng)域已經(jīng)失去了發(fā)展勢(shì)頭,但它卻握有大量的現(xiàn)金,而現(xiàn)在也到了蘋(píng)果應(yīng)該花錢(qián)的時(shí)候了。換句話說(shuō),蘋(píng)果現(xiàn)在應(yīng)該做的是收購(gòu),而不是自造。

那么,蘋(píng)果下一次收購(gòu)的目標(biāo)是誰(shuí)呢?首先,不管蘋(píng)果收購(gòu)誰(shuí),它必須要符合蘋(píng)果的公司形象。它應(yīng)該具有出色的設(shè)計(jì)水平和較好的創(chuàng)新性、簡(jiǎn)潔性、科技性,并且具有高端或奢華的口碑。這些標(biāo)準(zhǔn)就可以排除一些人們熱議已久的目標(biāo)了,比如迪士尼(業(yè)務(wù)太過(guò)多元化)和索尼(業(yè)務(wù)太復(fù)雜)。目前看來(lái),蘋(píng)果有可能或比較可能收購(gòu)的目標(biāo)有:

潘朵拉(Pandora,市值30億美元)

蘋(píng)果如果收購(gòu)Spotify,或許無(wú)法通過(guò)反壟斷機(jī)構(gòu)的審查。因此蘋(píng)果如果想在流媒體音樂(lè)領(lǐng)域擴(kuò)大地盤(pán),收購(gòu)潘朵拉或許是個(gè)不錯(cuò)的選擇,而且這筆交易的規(guī)模也相對(duì)較小,大約只在30億到50億美元之間。然而單憑這樣一次收購(gòu),對(duì)蘋(píng)果的整體業(yè)務(wù)其實(shí)推動(dòng)不大,蘋(píng)果的胃口應(yīng)該還要再大些。

特斯拉(440億美元市值)

蘋(píng)果和特斯拉多年以來(lái)一直相愛(ài)相殺,一邊相互貶低,一邊相互挖對(duì)方的工程師。特斯拉作為一個(gè)強(qiáng)勢(shì)的高端創(chuàng)新品牌,不失為蘋(píng)果進(jìn)入汽車(chē)業(yè)務(wù)的一個(gè)捷徑。然而特斯拉也是一家規(guī)模相對(duì)較小且利潤(rùn)較低的公司,而且對(duì)各種震蕩十分敏感。另外,說(shuō)到特斯拉就不能不提它的CEO伊隆·馬斯克,他與蘋(píng)果CEO蒂姆·庫(kù)克都是十分自負(fù)之人,說(shuō)不好會(huì)碰撞出什么火花。

PayPal(520億美元市值)

蘋(píng)果的移動(dòng)支付服務(wù)Apple Pay在2014年10月推出時(shí)曾被寄予厚望,但它的普及速度并沒(méi)有達(dá)到很多人的預(yù)期。蘋(píng)果很是吃了一番苦頭才明白金融服務(wù)業(yè)的水有多深,被保護(hù)得多好,以及有多難以攻克。假若能夠獲得反壟斷監(jiān)管部門(mén)的審批,那么收購(gòu)PayPal將使消費(fèi)者和商家更容易接受蘋(píng)果的支付服務(wù)。不過(guò)金融服務(wù)畢竟不是蘋(píng)果的核心業(yè)務(wù),甚至有可能讓它從核心業(yè)務(wù)上分心。

動(dòng)視暴雪(370億美元市值)

蘋(píng)果很有可能進(jìn)軍游戲領(lǐng)域,因?yàn)檫@個(gè)領(lǐng)域如今已經(jīng)比電影和音樂(lè)產(chǎn)業(yè)加起來(lái)還要龐大。雖然動(dòng)視暴雪沒(méi)有自己的游戲機(jī)業(yè)務(wù),但它在PC、網(wǎng)游和手游領(lǐng)域都十分強(qiáng)勁(為了進(jìn)軍手游界,它還收購(gòu)了熱門(mén)游戲《糖果粉碎傳奇》的制作商)。如果蘋(píng)果想要進(jìn)入一個(gè)臨近產(chǎn)業(yè),收購(gòu)動(dòng)視暴雪將是一個(gè)很不錯(cuò)的選擇。

Netflix(610億美元市值)

蘋(píng)果已經(jīng)圍繞視頻做了很多年的文章了,但它一直沒(méi)能擠進(jìn)視頻內(nèi)容制作或傳播的第一梯隊(duì)。蘋(píng)果通過(guò)iPod、iPhone和iPad收割了很大的價(jià)值,實(shí)現(xiàn)了巨大的成功,而內(nèi)容制作者等業(yè)內(nèi)其他各方實(shí)際上處于吃虧的地位。不過(guò)現(xiàn)在已有很多證據(jù)表明,目前天平正在朝遠(yuǎn)離設(shè)備制造商的一方傾斜。Netflix和亞馬遜都看到了這種趨勢(shì),也都在努力占據(jù)這股潮流的最前沿。

Netflix在這方面已經(jīng)取得了巨大的成功——首先是在傳播上,其次是在內(nèi)容制作上。相比之下,蘋(píng)果在這一領(lǐng)域的反應(yīng)則很慢,它需要付出大量努力才能彌補(bǔ)這一差距。尤其是現(xiàn)在各大傳統(tǒng)內(nèi)容制作商紛紛認(rèn)識(shí)到了他們所創(chuàng)作的內(nèi)容的價(jià)值,而亞馬遜等新進(jìn)者也發(fā)出了不少自己的聲音。Netflix雖然是個(gè)很貴的收購(gòu)目標(biāo),但它能給蘋(píng)果帶來(lái)巨大的平臺(tái)價(jià)值。

由于蘋(píng)果的口碑已陷入岌岌可危的境地,蘋(píng)果必須擴(kuò)展自己的當(dāng)前戰(zhàn)略,開(kāi)辟新的市場(chǎng)。從當(dāng)前的硬件市場(chǎng)上收割盡可能多的利潤(rùn)當(dāng)然是無(wú)可厚非的,但蘋(píng)果也需要在游戲、內(nèi)容制作與傳播等領(lǐng)域上創(chuàng)造價(jià)值。蘋(píng)果歷來(lái)喜歡用自己構(gòu)建的產(chǎn)品打入新市場(chǎng),然而它最近幾次的類似嘗試都以失敗而告終,時(shí)間也不再站在它這一邊了。因此,蘋(píng)果應(yīng)該利用它的巨額資本進(jìn)行戰(zhàn)略采購(gòu),并占領(lǐng)鄰近市場(chǎng)。而收購(gòu)動(dòng)視暴雪或者Netflix都是非常有吸引力的選項(xiàng)。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

作者:Michael Wade

譯者:樸成奎

本文作者M(jìn)ichael Wade是全球數(shù)字業(yè)務(wù)轉(zhuǎn)型中心(Global Center for Digital Business Transformation)主任、瑞士國(guó)際管理發(fā)展學(xué)院(IMD)創(chuàng)新與戰(zhàn)略學(xué)教授,也是《數(shù)字漩渦:當(dāng)今的市場(chǎng)領(lǐng)袖如何打敗顛覆性的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手》一書(shū)的作者之一。他并不是蘋(píng)果或本文提到的任何一家公司的投資人。

As Apple’s stock climbed to its fifth record in March on Tuesday, and it’s 11th record this year, it’s a good time to take a serious look at what the tech giant should take on next. Apple is renowned for being a great disruptor, relying on a “build rather than buy” approach. However, when the company released an underwhelming new iPad last week, many began to question its innovator status.

I previously argued that Apple is pursuing a harvest strategy, a smart strategic move in which it extracts as much profit as possible from a static or declining market. iPad sales are down (along with all tablets), and Apple is trying to capture returns while it is still possible to do so. This makes sense, and the markets seem to agree, as Apple stock hit another record level yesterday.

However, the Mac, iPad and iPhone – responsible for more than 85% of Apple’s revenue – are all under increasing pressure today, and the future looks harder, not easier. Consumers are resisting the urge to upgrade for marginal improvements. Competitors, like Samsung, ZTE and Huawei are closing the quality gap and are, in many cases, providing superior features at a lower cost. Plus, IOS is losing the global platform war with Android. While there is still plenty of harvesting to be done from these lines of business, the long-term prognosis does not look positive.

To reassert its place as a digital disruptor, Apple will need to move from a defensive strategy to an offensive one. Thankfully, Apple has the brand name, the loyal following, and, with around $200 billion in cash on the balance sheet, the money to do so. Yet, while other cash-rich competitors have splashed out on high-profile acquisitions, Apple has largely watched from the sidelines. Its largest acquisition to date has been Beats for $3 billion in 2014 – a mere pittance compared to many of its peers.

Apple’s recent attempts to occupy new battlegrounds have not been very successful. The Apple Watch has failed to ‘revolutionize the wrist;’ Apple’s car strategy seems to have stalled and Apple Music has not been closing the gap to Spotify. Apple needs to become better at occupying new competitive spaces, as explained in the Digital Vortex, whether or not it is the disruptor.

Building from scratch takes time, and Apple has lost momentum recently in areas outside its core. The company has cash, and now is the time to spend it. It’s time to buy rather than build.

So what should Apple’s next acquisition be? First, any acquisition should fit the company’s image. It should have great design, be innovative, simplistic, technology-focused, and have a high-end or luxury reputation. These criteria rule out some commonly considered targets such as Disney (too diversified) and Sony (too complex). A list of possible and not-so-possible contenders includes:

Pandora ($3 billion market cap)

An acquisition of Spotify would probably not clear anti-trust scrutiny, so if Apple wants to gain an additional foothold in the music streaming arena, it could buy Pandora for a relatively small $3 billion to $5 billion. However, this will not move the needle much, and Apple should be thinking bigger.

Tesla ($44 billion market cap)

Apple and Tesla have been trading barbs and engineers for years. Buying Tesla could be a fast way for Apple to enter the car business, with a strong, high-end, innovative brand. However, Tesla is relatively small, unprofitable and vulnerable to shocks. It is also very much linked to its CEO, Elon Musk, which could mean a clash of egos with Apple CEO Tim Cook.

PayPal ($52 billion market cap)

Apple Pay, launched with great fanfare in October 2014, has not taken off as quickly as many expected. Apple has learned the hard way that the financial services industry is complex, well protected and generally hard to crack. The acquisition of PayPal (assuming it is approved by anti-trust regulators) would give Apple more heft to convince both consumers to adopt and merchants to accept its payment service. However, financial services are a long way from Apple’s core, and could become a distraction.

Activision Blizzard ($37 billion market cap)

Apple could move into the gaming arena, which has now become bigger than both the movie and music industries combined. While Activision Blizzard does not have a game console business, it is strong in PC, online and mobile gaming (with the acquisition of the parent company of Candy Crush). If Apple wants to enter an adjacent industry, this is an interesting option.

Netflix ($61 billion market cap)

Apple has been dancing around video for years, but has never managed to crack the upper echelons of content creation or distribution. It has achieved great success by capturing value from devices such as the iPod, iPhone and iPad at the expense of content generators and other ecosystem players. However, there is plenty of evidence to suggest this balance is swinging away from device manufacturers. Both Netflix and Amazon understood this trend, and have been making strides to get ahead of it.

Netflix has been tremendously successful — first in the distribution, and now in the generation of content. Apple, by contrast, has been slow to react. It will have a hard time bridging this gap, especially with the traditional content generators waking up to the value they create, and other new entrants, like Amazon, making a lot of noise. Netflix is an expensive option, but would bring Apple massive platform value.

With its reputation at stake, Apple must expand on its current strategy and open new markets to play in. Harvesting as much profit as possible from its current hardware business makes sense, but it needs to transfer this value to new areas, such as gaming, and content generation and distribution. Traditionally, Apple builds its own products to enter new markets. However, its last few attempts to do so have flopped and time is not on its side. Therefore, Apple should use its massive wealth to make strategic acquisitions and occupy adjacent markets – with Activision Blizzard or Netflix making very attractive targets.

Michael Wade is Director of the Global Center for Digital Business Transformation, Professor of Innovation and Strategy at IMD and co-author of Digital Vortex: How Today's Market Leaders Can Beat Disruptive Competitors at Their Own Game. Wade is not an investor in Apple or other companies noted in this article.

掃描二維碼下載財(cái)富APP
一卡二卡亚洲乱码一卡二卡| 久久精品一区二区白丝袜自慰| 亚洲欧洲日韩国产精品妖精| 国产亚洲综合在线观看播放页| 闷骚的小少妇全程露脸激情大秀直播| 人妻中文字幕无码在线a| 国产精品免费久久久久久蜜桃| 伊伊人成亚洲综合人网香| 亚洲国产精品一区二区第一页| 国产亚洲欧美日韩亚洲中文色| 精品福利一区二区三区精品| 久久久亚洲精品无码| 中文人妻无码一区二区三区信息| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品播放| jizz中文字幕在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区综合| 国产韩国精品一区二区三区久久| 亚洲AV高清一区二区三区| 国产精品亚洲第一区在线观看| 国产一起色一起爱| 国产无码高清视频不卡| 日本韩国黄色一区二区三区| 久久熟女高清毛片国产精品| 无码理论在线中文字幕| 免费一级欧美片在线观看亚| 久久国产欧美日韩精品| 精品无人区卡卡二卡三乱码| 久久毛片基地全免费的| 偷偷做久久久久网站| 欧美激情在线一区二区三区| 亚洲AV成人一区二区三区观看| 日日av拍夜夜添久久免费| 強奷人妻日本中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩国产成人一区| 国模精品一区二区三区| 做受视频国产免费观看| 99久久99视频只有精品| 国产成人精品一区二区三在线观看| 国产亚洲综合成人91精品| 亚洲日韩精品无码专区加勒比海|