工資沒得商量的工作機會是否公平?
????初創(chuàng)公司創(chuàng)始人邁克爾?沃爾夫的回答 ????這很常見,尤其是對于入門級工作而言 ????如果你去參軍,成為公務(wù)員,當(dāng)警察,或者做大學(xué)教授,這些工作的薪酬都是與崗位掛鉤,與人無關(guān)。你會得到與其他人相同的條件。 ????許多公司也是如此。例如,我的第一份工作是在高盛公司(Goldman Sachs)。當(dāng)年與我從事相同職務(wù)的大學(xué)畢業(yè)生,都收到了完全一樣的條件。雖然高盛可能是世界上薪酬最高的公司,但對于剛畢業(yè)的學(xué)生而言,我們整個項目團隊都領(lǐng)取相同的薪酬。 ????如果條件不錯,不妨接受它。否則,還是另謀高就吧。 ????創(chuàng)業(yè)者、投資人、導(dǎo)師戴維?S?羅斯的回答 ????首先,放下自己的架子。工資條件不存在“公平”或者“不公平”之說,也不可能帶有“侮辱性”。這只是一份工作邀請,接受與否完全由你自己把握。 ????如果提出條件的公司表示,工資沒有商量余地,那就接受它,因為這些工資起碼能讓你的生活變得更輕松。很簡單,你現(xiàn)在有兩個選擇:真誠地接受這份工作,努力在這個初級崗位上做到出類拔萃;或者禮貌地拒絕,然后繼續(xù)求職。沒什么大不了的,也沒必要過于情緒化。如果工作和薪酬都不適合你,你完全可以拒絕。如果他們不準(zhǔn)備討論工資問題(這在初級工作崗位上很常見),那就繼續(xù)尋找其他機會,但千萬不要說“不公平和侮辱性”這些愚蠢的話,斷了自己的后路。 ????企業(yè)家吉尼?卡利亞平的回答 ????幾年前,我接受了一份薪酬不容商量的工作,而且我只要了一半的工資。為什么?因為我當(dāng)時只剩1,000美元,因此,必須想辦法在紐約生存下去,而且在那家公司工作的經(jīng)歷,對我來說非常寶貴。 ????雖然很難,但我還是堅持了下來。我租了一個小房間,租金360美元。我第二份工作的薪酬遠遠高于市場水平,我在那個大城市里過得很好。對于每一份“不公平”的工作邀請,可能會有些人希望抓住這次機會,把它作為開啟輝煌事業(yè)的第一步。這是非常公平的。如果你不是我所說的“這些人”,那說明這樣的工作不適合你。 ????可以這樣來回答你的問題:提供沒有商量余地的工資,是絕對公平的。想象一下,假如對方提供了遠遠超出你預(yù)期的條件,比正常工資水平高出一倍,而且不容商量——這種條件是否依然不公平? ????下面,按照你的本意來回答你的問題:沒錯,提供非常低的工資也是公平的。這是一個供需關(guān)系決定的自由市場。你不喜歡這樣的工資?那就繼續(xù)找其他機會!企業(yè)要么會找到愿意接受這種條件的人,要么不得不提高條件。你的生活狀況和你要支付的租金與此無關(guān);換句話說,初級職位的工資由市場決定,而不是某個人。 |
????Answer by Michael Wolfe, startup founder ????This is extremely common, especially for entry-level jobs. ????If you join the military, civil service, police force, become a professor at many schools, etc…, you will be going into a job where the salary is pegged to the job, not the person. You will receive the same offer as everyone else. ????Many corporations are the same way. For example, I started my career at Goldman Sachs GS 0.77% . Every new college grad that year in my role received identical offers. Note that this is probably the best-paying corporation in the world, but for new grads, our entire program had identical comp. ????If it is a good offer, take it. If not, look elsewhere. ????Answer by David S. Rose, entrepreneur, investor, mentor ????First of all, get off your high horse. There is nothing “fair” or “unfair” about a salary offer, nor is there any way it can be “insulting.” It is simply an offer that you are free to accept or reject. ????If the company that is offering it says that it is non-negotiable, take them at face value because they’ve just made your life a lot easier. You now have a simple, binary decision: take the job with a good heart and a desire to excel at this entry-level job, or else politely decline it and keep on looking. No big deal and no need for drama. If the combination of job and salary is not right for you,that’s perfectly OK. So if they are not prepared to negotiate (which is not at all atypical for entry level jobs) just move on, and don’t burn any bridges with silly talk about “unfair and insulting.” ????Answer by Gene Khalyapin, entrepreneur ????Years ago I accepted a non-negotiable offer at half the going rate. Why? Because I had only $1,000 and I absolutely had to find a way to survive in New York, plus experience working for that company was very valuable to me. ????It was tough but I made it work. My rent was $360 for a tiny room. My next job was well above the market rate and I did well in that great city. For every “unfair” job offer there may be somebody who would take that chance and make it a first step on the way to a brilliant career. And this is very fair. If you are not that “somebody” then this offer is not for you. ????To answer your question as it is: it is absolutely fair to offer non-negotiable salary. Imagine you are offered double the regular rate and more than you expected but they don’t negotiate – would it still be unfair? ????Now, to answer the question that you actually meant to ask: yes, it is also fair to offer a very low salary. It’s a free market driven by supply and demand. You don’t like the salary? Move on! Either they will find somebody who accepts the offer or they will be forced to raise the offer. Your living situation and your rent payment is irrelevant. |
-
熱讀文章
-
熱門視頻